2005
DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.01025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin plus mitotane in the treatment of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma: a large prospective phase II trial

Abstract: To investigate the activity of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin plus mitotane in the management of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) patients, 72 patients with measurable disease not amenable to radical surgery were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter phase II trial. EDP schedule (etoposide 100 mg/m 2 on days 5-7, doxorubicin 20 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 9) was administered intravenously every 4 weeks. Concomitantly, patients were given up to 4 g/day of oral mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
204
2
17

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
204
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…An international network of closely collaborating investigators was the key to achieving this enrollment of patients within only 5.4 years, which is equivalent to a recruitment rate of 56 patients per year, as compared with a maximum of 7 patients per year in previous studies. 17,[25][26][27][28] This successful enrollment shows that an investigator-initiated, randomized phase 3 trial of treatment in patients with a rare tumor is feasible, despite the lack of pharmaceutical interest in sponsoring such a trial. Further strengths of the trial include its prospective, randomized design; the intentionto-treat analysis; the high percentage of patients who were evaluated for the predefined end points; and the small number of censored observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An international network of closely collaborating investigators was the key to achieving this enrollment of patients within only 5.4 years, which is equivalent to a recruitment rate of 56 patients per year, as compared with a maximum of 7 patients per year in previous studies. 17,[25][26][27][28] This successful enrollment shows that an investigator-initiated, randomized phase 3 trial of treatment in patients with a rare tumor is feasible, despite the lack of pharmaceutical interest in sponsoring such a trial. Further strengths of the trial include its prospective, randomized design; the intentionto-treat analysis; the high percentage of patients who were evaluated for the predefined end points; and the small number of censored observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leukopenia is one of the dose-limiting side effects of the classical Berruti (EDP-M) protocol (Berruti et al 2005) and further commonly observed serious adverse effects associated with doxorubicin or cisplatin include cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity (Fassnacht et al 2012). Liposomal encapsulation of cisplatin (Boulikas 2004, Devarajan et al 2004) and doxorubicin (Harrington et al 2002, Huwyler et al 2008 has been shown to quench these drug-specific side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery is regarded as therapy of choice in all patients with resectable tumour, but 25% of patients already have distant metastases at the time of primary diagnosis and the majority of patients develop metastases even after assumed curative surgery (2-12). In 2003, an international consensus conference on the management of ACC recommended for patients with advanced metastatic disease mitotane as monotherapy or combined with etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (13) or with streptozotocin (14) as first-line systemic treatment based on two phase II trials leading to an evidence level not better than 2 (1). The two latter regimens are currently compared in the first randomized trial in this disease (FIRM-ACT trial, www.firm-act.org).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%