1992
DOI: 10.1002/hon.2900100204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etoposide in combination with intermediate dose cytosine arabinoside (ID ARA C) given with the intention of further myeloablative therapy for the treatment of refractory or recurrent hematological malignancy

Abstract: Thirty-four patients with refractory or recurrent high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or acute leukemia were treated with a combination of etoposide, 100 mg/m2 daily, and ara C, 1 g/m2 twice daily, for 5 days (VPARAC). This therapy was given in the anticipation that remissions thus achieved would be 'consolidated' with myeloablative therapy supported by bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The complete remission rate (CR) in patients with NHL was 3/18 (17 per cent) with partial responses (PR) seen in a furth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major differences between this regimen and previous ones were: an increase in the total amount of treatment and the addition of etoposide and ara-C. At SBH, the addition of high-dose ara-C (in most patients given as consolidation therapy) in the past had been shown to improve remission duration in patients with T-cell ALL [17]. The rationale for adding an epipodophyllotoxin in combination with ara-C was based on encouraging results originally reported for children with refractory and recurrent ALL [15,16] and in adults with acute leukaemia treated at SBH [22]. Maintenance therapy was not given to patients with T-cell ALL because of strong circumstantial evidence that it has no relevance within the context of intensive early therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The major differences between this regimen and previous ones were: an increase in the total amount of treatment and the addition of etoposide and ara-C. At SBH, the addition of high-dose ara-C (in most patients given as consolidation therapy) in the past had been shown to improve remission duration in patients with T-cell ALL [17]. The rationale for adding an epipodophyllotoxin in combination with ara-C was based on encouraging results originally reported for children with refractory and recurrent ALL [15,16] and in adults with acute leukaemia treated at SBH [22]. Maintenance therapy was not given to patients with T-cell ALL because of strong circumstantial evidence that it has no relevance within the context of intensive early therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%