Étude de corrélation de mesure des index de pression systolique à la cheville (IPSc) par Doppler couleur versus Doppler continu sur une population de 98 patients après analyse de la reproductibilité interobservateur

Gestin, Simon; Delluc, Aurélien; Saliou, Anne-Hélène; Colas, A.; Gueguen, François; Gladu, G.; Garrigues, Florent; Bressollette, Luc; Quéhé, P.

doi:10.1016/j.jmv.2012.05.007

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Twenty-one papers were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (Fig. 1): 10 papers reported comparison of methods [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], five studies did not report measures of reliability [36][37][38][39][40], two studies compared raters' experience [41,42] and one reported a novel trial design, for which the reliability results were duplicated in another included paper [43]. One paper used measures repeated at up to 365 days apart, with a mean time between measures of 228 days, which is long enough to encompass changes attributable to progression of PAD [44].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review

Casey

Oldmeadow²,

Chuter

2019

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The ankle brachial index (ABI) is widely used in clinical practice as a non-invasive method to detect the presence and severity of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Current guidelines suggest that it should be used to monitor potential progression of PAD in affected individuals. As such, it is important that the test is reliable when used for repeated measurements, by the same or different health practitioners. This systematic review aims to examine the literature to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the ABI. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL Complete was conducted to 20 January 2019. Two authors independently reviewed and selected relevant studies and extracted the data. Methodological quality was determined using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability (QAREL) Checklist. Results Fifteen studies of ABI reliability in a range of patient populations were identified as suitable for inclusion in the review: seven considered inter-rater reliability, four intra-rater reliability, and four studies evaluated both inter- and intra-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability was found to be highly variable, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC’s) ranging from poor to excellent (ICC 0.42–1.00), while intra-rater also demonstrated considerable variation, with ICCs from 0.42–0.98. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the lack of statistical information reported. Conclusions Results of included studies suggest the inter- and intra-tester reliability of the ABI is acceptable. However, inconsistencies in obtaining systolic pressure measurements, calculating ABI values, and incomplete reporting of methodologies and statistical analysis make it difficult to determine the validity of the results of included studies. Further research, with more consistent reliability methodology, statistical analysis and reporting conducted in populations at risk of PAD is needed to conclusively determine the ABI reliability.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review

Casey

Oldmeadow²,

Chuter

2019

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some publications have reported the possibility of using a Doppler probe in color flow imaging or pulsed-wave mode to measure BP. 11,12 In another study, no difference was observed between arm BP values measured by an automatic BP monitor and those determined using a continuous-wave Doppler probe. 13 To optimize efficacy in routine clinical practice, measurement of brachial BP using devices other than a continuous-wave Doppler probe (e.g.…”

Section: Diagnostic Criteria For Lower Extremity Artery Diseasementioning

confidence: 94%

“…Only 66% of the experts agreed with this proposal. The other experts justified their position on the grounds that the proposal was based on the results of a single study 12 and that the efficacy of this method depends too much on equipment calibration and is substantially reduced in the presence of calcifications.…”

Section: Suggestions and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Teamworking in Error Reduction during Vascular Procedures

Soane¹,

Bicknell²,

Mason³

et al. 2014

Annals of Vascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Disparities Between International Guidelines (AHA/ESC/ESVS/ESVM/SVS) Concerning Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Consensus of the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and the French Society for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SCVE)

Böge

Bura-Rivière

Chakfé

et al. 2021

Annals of Vascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several international guidelines concerning lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) have been published recently, in particular, by the American Heart Association the European Society of Cardiology/European Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Society for Vascular Medicine and the Society for Vascular Surgery. These guidelines differ in some respects and certain issues are not addressed. The objective of this consensus driven by the French Societies of vascular Medicine and surgery was to analyze the disparities between the different guidelines, as well as certain issues not covered, and develop proposals with regard to these points. The following fields of LEAD have been explored: 1) classifications, 2) clinical evaluation, 3) diagnostic criteria, 4) quantification of arterial stenosis using duplex ultrasound, 5) detection of asymptomatic multisite lesions, 6) screening for LEAD in the context of cardiac disease, 7) medical treatment, 8) supervised exercise therapy, 9) revascularization and revascularization of the internal artery stenosis, 10) management of chronic limb ischemia, 11) longitudinal follow-up, and 12) diet. Limb ischemia with threatened viability related to several factors (neurologic, infectious.). This term was proposed by the ESC and ESVS groups in the guidelines published in 2017. Claudication Pain, cramp, or muscular fatigue of arterial origin, induced by exercise in the active muscle group and relieved by rest (within a few minutes) Maximum walking distance Maximum walking distance in meters before the onset of severe pain precludes further walking. Resting TcPO 2 Transcutaneous oxygen pressure measured at rest Minor amputation Distal amputation preserving the heel LEAD Major amputation Amputation involving loss of the heel LEAD Endovascular treatment Any endoluminal treatment, irrespective of the method used, as opposed to open surgery. Volume 72, April 2021 SFMV/SCVE consensus about LEAD 3 IiA-3. In view of the impact of LEAD on therapeutic strategy, we suggest screening for this Volume 72, April 2021 SFMV/SCVE consensus about LEAD 5 CV, cardiovascular; SCORE, systematic coronary risk estimation; GFR, glomerular filtration rate. Volume 72, April 2021 SFMV/SCVE consensus about LEAD 11 a Proteinuria, renal insufficiency defined by a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , left ventricular hypertrophy, or retinopathy. b Age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity. Volume 72, April 2021 SFMV/SCVE consensus about LEAD 13 PSV means peak systolic velocity; PSVR means peak systolic velocity ratio. PSVs are expressed in cm/s.

show abstract

Étude de corrélation de mesure des index de pression systolique à la cheville (IPSc) par Doppler couleur versus Doppler continu sur une population de 98 patients après analyse de la reproductibilité interobservateur

Cited by 5 publications

References 18 publications

The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review

The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review

The Role of Teamworking in Error Reduction during Vascular Procedures

Disparities Between International Guidelines (AHA/ESC/ESVS/ESVM/SVS) Concerning Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Consensus of the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and the French Society for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SCVE)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About