1961
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(61)90195-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etude spectrophotometrique de la serie jaune de Cu2O aux basses temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of defects such as copper vacancies and oxygen interstitials leads to less localised holes, with acceptor levels above the valence band maximum. [12][13][14] However, the band gap of Cu 2 O ($2.17 eV 15 ) is too small for transparency preventing its use as a TCO. This problem has been overcome through alloying Cu 2 O with Al 2 O 3 to produce one of the first known p-type TCOs, CuAlO 2 10 which has an optical band gap of 3.5 eV, and preserves the p-type conducting properties of the Cu 2 …”
Section: 9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of defects such as copper vacancies and oxygen interstitials leads to less localised holes, with acceptor levels above the valence band maximum. [12][13][14] However, the band gap of Cu 2 O ($2.17 eV 15 ) is too small for transparency preventing its use as a TCO. This problem has been overcome through alloying Cu 2 O with Al 2 O 3 to produce one of the first known p-type TCOs, CuAlO 2 10 which has an optical band gap of 3.5 eV, and preserves the p-type conducting properties of the Cu 2 …”
Section: 9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected to have an essentially full Cu-3d shell, with a band gap ranging from 2 to 2.2 eV [28,29] , which usually was set to 2. 17 eV [30] . We can fi nd that the band gap calculated by DFT (about 0.5-0.8 eV ) is much smaller than the experimental value (2.17 eV) [31] , attributable to the deficient treatment in the electrical and electronic exchange interaction with GGA [32] , while the Hartree-Fock methods overestimate the band gap (9.7 eV) significantly [33] .…”
Section: Band Gapmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The splitting δ 2P −1S and the coefficient A = |D 20y | 2 /( 0h γ 2P V ) depends on the material parameters, |D 20y | 2 being proportional to the 2P exciton oscillator strength. For the yellow exciton series of bulk Cu 2 O one hashω 2P 2.148 eV andhδ 2P −1S = 115 meV [7], while from the measured linewidthhγ 2P 1 meV [7] and oscillator strength [6] the coefficient A can be estimated to be A 0.02. Such a small value, due to the fact that the 2P exciton line is rather weak (second-class transition) [8], is comparable to that of cold atomic gases where A commonly varies in the range 10 −2 -10 −1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It originates mainly from indirect transitions, surface and impurity scattering and is directly related to the background value κ ∞ of the extinction coefficient. The latter can be estimated from the logarithm of the measured exciton peak transmission relative to the background value; from [6] we can infer an average value κ ∞ 4 × 10 −4 over the 2P exciton absorption linewidth yielding ∞ = 2 × 10 −3 . With the help of (9) we evaluate G T which we show in fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation