EU Cohesion policy and the peripheries of the new Member States

Grosse, Tomasz Grzegorz

doi:10.4324/9780203855386-17

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Against the background of the neoclassical trend, a contemporary model of the so-called new economic geography emerges, which combines three elements: the agglomeration benefits, transport costs and the cost of production mean flows (Krugman, 1998). The model assumes the possibility of the occurrence of, and even the deepening of, interregional differences, which, according to Grosse (2018), is a result of the tendency to accumulate the factors of the development in the most developed metropolitan areas.…”

Section: Regional Development In Subject Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2024

SPSUTOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study is to determine the role of multimedia technologies used in architecture for socially significant communication. It is important to answer the following question: Can the content and graphic shapes included in the façade be used to shape public awareness and create social identity? One of the objectives is to examine the marketing potential of a message included in an image on a façade, and the possibilities of using it in building a region's brand. Design/methodology/approach: The examination included 15 buildings in which various multimedia technologies were used with the intention to create a message. Among the solutions applied in these objects are those in which the message is composed directly, by a metaphor, or indirectly in combination with the architectural features. The research material was analysed, and groups of useful subjects were selected for further investigation: -Promotion of a town.-Accentuating the location.-Accentuating the importance of events.-Popularisation of art.-Façade as a display and information channel. Findings: groups of subjects were selected, which might be used in creating social integration and regional marketing. Research limitations/implications:The below research is of preliminary character. In next steps, other aspects could be added, e.g. multimedia technologies, or seeking means of expression, methods of building images. Practical implications: The article presents the possibilities that multimedia systems offer in the area of message creation. It could potentially give direction to decision-makers with regard to their marketing activities, or the efforts to accentuate certain public functions of a town or region. The results of this research may interest investors, architects, and artists. The anticipated effect is that both awareness and the frequency of using multimedia systems will grow. Social implications: The article discusses the questions of the social role of art and façade graphics in architecture. It examines the effects of a message contained in an image on the issues of social identity and developing bonds. Originality/value: The study proves that façade graphics have a substantial impact, and it shows the possibilities of using such graphics in regional marketing; it also mentions their form, scope, and means.

show abstract

Section: Regional Development In Subject Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2024

SPSUTOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In line with the neoclassical trend, a contemporary model was also created of the so-called new economic geography, which combines three factors: transport cost, the benefits of an agglomeration and the cost of production flow resources (see: Krugman 1998). The model established that there is a possibility of the occurrence, and even of the intensifying, the differences between regions, which according to Grosse (2018) is an effect of the trend of accumulating the factors of development in the most developed capital regions of the metropolitan area. New economic geography along with the new theory of development have found a widespread use within the concept of the policy of endogenous regional development (see : Eshugova 2018).…”

Section: Factors Of Regional Development In the Subject Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

The variation in the level of the socio-economic development of the NUTS-3 subregions in the European Union

Spychała¹

2023

Argumenta Oeconomica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A very important research problem is the specification of the level of the socio-economic development of the EU regions. Within the cohesion policy, one may differentiate between regions more and less advanced in terms of general development, including the worth of GDP per capita. Following that measure, one can establish the areas eligible for getting help from EU budget support programmes. The purpose of the article was to present the variation in the level of the socio-economic development of 28 EU countries within the 1,347 NUTS-3 units. The level of the development was established on a multilevel basis, subcategorising three factors of regional development: human capital, the natural environment and the economy. The article specifies the extent of the NUTS-3 unit general progression following the analysis of 31 indicative measures structured around publicly available Eurostat statistical data (as of 2019). The extent of the progression was demonstrated based on a synthetic measure revealing the taxonomic distance of a particular region from the assumed arrangement measuring the development. The research procedure consisted of five development levels, namely: the establishment of factors of the progression of regions, a choice of variable factors, a decrease in the multi-factor space, an identification in the extent of the social and economic progression of the researched units and a subcategorisation of the units on the scale of the social and economic progression structured around a ranking prepared using the analysis of a lowering synthetic measure. The research resulted in spatial variation of 1,347 NUTS-3 unit subregions in 28 EU states presented in terms of the level of the social and economic progression and the three subparts of the progression. The highest synthetic measure was noted in the areas including the capitals of the states included in the research and in a belt comprising the Irish subregions, Central England, the Benelux states, Western and Southern Germany, up until the Alpine subregion. Moreover, significant differences between the levels of the development within the respective states were presented. The results of the research may be a source of inspiration for EU institutions within the scope of the manner of specifying the richest and the poorest EU regions, whose purpose is to ensure the efficient introduction and conclusion of the cohesion policy in the programming periods specified.

show abstract

“…nowej geografii ekonomicznej, który łączy w sobie trzy elementy: korzyści aglomeracji, koszty transportu i koszty przepływów czynników produkcji (Krugman, 1998). Model ten zakłada możliwość występowania, a nawet pogłębiania się różnic międzyregionalnych, co zdaniem Grosse (2018) jest wynikiem tendencji do kumulowania czynników wzrostu w najbardziej rozwiniętych regionach metropolitarnych.…”

Section: /2022unclassified

“…Występowanie dysproporcji rozwojowych jest zgodne z założeniami nowej teorii wzrostu Romera (Arranz i in., 2019). Duże zróżnicowanie rozwoju gospodarczego regionów UE przedstawiono również w opracowaniach takich autorów jak: Balcerzak (2016), Grosse (2018) oraz Azis (2020). Występowanie dużych dysproporcji rozwojowych w regionach UE, potwierdzone w badaniach przeprowadzonych w ramach niniejszego artykułu, stanowi podstawę realizacji unijnej polityki spójności poprzez odpowiednią alokację i udostępnianie funduszy UE.…”

Section: Dyskusjaunclassified

Zróżnicowanie rozwoju regionalnego w Polsce, Czechach i na Słowacji

Spychała

Spychała²

2022

ppe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie zróżnicowania poziomu rozwoju 95 podregionów poziomu NUTS-3 w Polsce, Czechach i na Słowacji. Poziom tego rozwoju zostanie ustalony w sposób wielokryterialny, wyodrębniając trzy czynniki rozwoju regionalnego: społeczeństwo, środowisko naturalne oraz gospodarkę. W opracowaniu przedstawiono poziom rozwoju regionalnego regionów NUTS-3 na podstawie 31 wskaźników zbudowanych w oparciu o publiczne dane statystyczne bazy Eurostat. Poziom rozwoju został przedstawiony na podstawie syntetycznego miernika ukazującego odległość taksonomiczną danego regionu od ustalonego wzorca rozwoju. Procedura badawcza składała się z czterech etapów i obejmowała: dobór zmiennych, redukcję przestrzeni wielocechowej, określenie poziomu rozwoju regionalnego badanych jednostek oraz klasyfikację regionów na skali poziomu rozwoju regionalnego na podstawie rankingu tworzonego według malejącej wartości miernika syntetycznego. W wyniku przeprowadzonego badania przedstawiono zróżnicowanie przestrzenne 95 podregionów poziomu NUTS-3 w Polsce, Czechach i na Słowacji ze względu na poziom rozwoju regionalnego oraz trzech składowych stanowiących czynniki tego rozwoju. Najwyższą wartość miernika syntetycznego odnotowano w regionach obejmujących stolice poszczególnych państw. Dodatkowo zidentyfikowano znaczne dysproporcje rozwojowe w ramach poszczególnych państw. Uzyskane wyniki badania mogą stanowić źródło inspiracji dla instytucji Unii Europejskiej w zakresie sposobu określania najbogatszych i najbiedniejszych regionów unijnych w celu skutecznego prowadzenia polityki spójności w kolejnych okresach programowania.

show abstract

EU Cohesion policy and the peripheries of the new Member States

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Untitled

Untitled

The variation in the level of the socio-economic development of the NUTS-3 subregions in the European Union

Zróżnicowanie rozwoju regionalnego w Polsce, Czechach i na Słowacji

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About