2013
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199651979.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU Consumer Law and Human Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The revised UNGCP therefore reflect a general shift from a focus on "traditional" mechanisms of redress, towards a broader access to justice approach, which aims to provide consumers with a wider choice between different dispute resolutions and redress options (Benöhr 2013;Cappelletti 1993;UNCTAD Manual 2017, 83-88). In particular, the quality requirements for collective redress and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms set by the new UNGCP constitute an important step in facilitating access to justice.…”
Section: Dispute Resolution and Redressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revised UNGCP therefore reflect a general shift from a focus on "traditional" mechanisms of redress, towards a broader access to justice approach, which aims to provide consumers with a wider choice between different dispute resolutions and redress options (Benöhr 2013;Cappelletti 1993;UNCTAD Manual 2017, 83-88). In particular, the quality requirements for collective redress and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms set by the new UNGCP constitute an important step in facilitating access to justice.…”
Section: Dispute Resolution and Redressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…193 In particular, globalisation and technological developments create new realities for customers in which they are exposed to different challenges such as risk of abuse, information asymmetries, and difficulties regarding access to justice. 194 Such new market developments prompted in the EU the idea to confront the challenges facing customers also in the context of the human rights framework and thereby to add the provision in the EU Charter specifying that EU policies shall ensure a high level of consumer protection (Article 38 EU Charter).…”
Section: Substantive Scope Of the Rightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micklitz identified commonalities and differences in organization, areas, and activities of four European consumer protection models in the 1970s: common law, the Roman (or Mediterranean), the German, and the Scandinavian approaches (Benöhr 2013;Micklitz 2004Micklitz , 2003. Common law, being pragmatic by nature, constrained regulation to certain areas such as product liability and competition and promoted self-regulation, while the Roman tradition with its legacy of policy centralism highlighted the interplay between free markets and interventionism.…”
Section: Commonalities In the Development Of Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, competition rules have a prominent role in the free movement of goods and services, and the European Member States have also regulated markets in other ways to protect consumers from, for instance, product-related damages and fraud. European consumer law, in turn, developed through its linkages with the Single Market in the 1990s and later progressed in the direction of full harmonization (Benöhr 2013). Regulation that targets better market performance also aims to foster conditions favourable to innovations and dynamic business environments in the global economy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation