2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2281108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU Data Protection Legislation and Case-Law with Regard to Biometric Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although most aspects can be accurately evaluated in ABC systems, the accuracy evaluation faces some challenges because too few impostor attempts are present [MacLeod and McLindin 2011] and collected biometric data are not readily made public for privacy reasons. In fact, the legislation of some countries does not allow the public dissemination of biometric data (particularly regarding the fingerprint and iris traits), match scores, and decision thresholds obtained and used by the biometric systems installed for government activities [Sprokkereef 2008;Iglezakis 2013]. Therefore, it is not possible to compute the typical figures of merit used in the accuracy evaluation of biometric systems, such as the FAR, FRR, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) [Gamassi et al 2005a;Mansfield and Wayman 2002], and the evaluation of the accuracy primarily relies on figures of merit computed using technology evaluations performed on public datasets or using internal testing procedures [MacLeod and McLindin 2011].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Biometric Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although most aspects can be accurately evaluated in ABC systems, the accuracy evaluation faces some challenges because too few impostor attempts are present [MacLeod and McLindin 2011] and collected biometric data are not readily made public for privacy reasons. In fact, the legislation of some countries does not allow the public dissemination of biometric data (particularly regarding the fingerprint and iris traits), match scores, and decision thresholds obtained and used by the biometric systems installed for government activities [Sprokkereef 2008;Iglezakis 2013]. Therefore, it is not possible to compute the typical figures of merit used in the accuracy evaluation of biometric systems, such as the FAR, FRR, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) [Gamassi et al 2005a;Mansfield and Wayman 2002], and the evaluation of the accuracy primarily relies on figures of merit computed using technology evaluations performed on public datasets or using internal testing procedures [MacLeod and McLindin 2011].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Biometric Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Privacy protection represents another important challenge for the development of viable fusion methods for ABC systems. In some countries, the legal framework denies the possibility to store and disseminate biometric data obtained from government systems [6], resulting in a design problem from two perspectives. First, many advanced fusion techniques, such as classifier-based techniques [4], require a preliminary training to tune some of the parameters.…”
Section: Multimodal Biometric Fusion In Abc Systems a Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore necessary to rely on evaluations carried out using public datasets or with internal testing procedures [7]. An alternative is to perform the analysis using a subset of the transactions carried out by the ABC system that guarantees privacy protection [6].…”
Section: Multimodal Biometric Fusion In Abc Systems a Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the regulations of some countries pose strong restrictions on the use of biometric data captured for government applications (e.g., border control) [27], limiting the applicability of score normalization techniques. These regulations regard the type of data stored in ABC systems, limit the amount of usable information, and impose the use of well-known cryptographic algorithms (e.g., AES) that differ from template protection methods specifically designed for biometric systems [28]- [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%