Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This paper seeks to present a theoretical development of the main lines of research that have addressed the emergence of a European Public Sphere (EPS). To this end, the outcomes of the literature are organized into three main categories: political communication in the European Union (EU), the role of digital platforms in a potential public sphere, and the progressive politicization of the EU. Finally, a range of pending challenges are identified. Facing them will help improve research in this field. The increasing politicization of 'Europe' as a topic in the literature and the constant use of digital platforms encourage a European public opinion, which acts together on certain issues beyond the institutional framework. The studies of the coming years have the challenge of combining these variables as well as broadening methodological and theoretical models.
This paper seeks to present a theoretical development of the main lines of research that have addressed the emergence of a European Public Sphere (EPS). To this end, the outcomes of the literature are organized into three main categories: political communication in the European Union (EU), the role of digital platforms in a potential public sphere, and the progressive politicization of the EU. Finally, a range of pending challenges are identified. Facing them will help improve research in this field. The increasing politicization of 'Europe' as a topic in the literature and the constant use of digital platforms encourage a European public opinion, which acts together on certain issues beyond the institutional framework. The studies of the coming years have the challenge of combining these variables as well as broadening methodological and theoretical models.
The Covid-19 pandemic meant challenges in crisis management for democratic institutions such as the European Union (EU). To achieve an economic and social recovery to the crisis, the EU institutions have promoted the NextGenerationEU (NGEU) program, a massive recovery package for this purpose. This action takes place at a time of strong visibility of Euroscepticism within a global phenomenon of distrust in political authorities. The present work aims to know the shaping of the European Public Sphere when NGEU is launched. First, the evolution of EU support during the pandemic is described, analyzing the possible factors that influence on this variable. On this matter, a secondary analysis of data is applied on different waves of the Eurobarometer (EB 92, 93, 94 and 95). The statistical method is also used to give items that determine the image of the EU. Moreover, the communicative dissemination of this plan is drawing upon semi-structured interviews with some of the professionals who deal with the task. The objective is to provide an overview of how the public sphere made up of citizens and institutions is defined before a moment of symbolic relevance. The results reveal a trend towards greater positivity with the EU after the pandemic. However, among other possible factors, the degree of support depends on the ideological position and, to a lesser extent, on the type of community where the citizens live. EU officials assess this rise of Europeanism as an opportunity, targeting the NGEU communication campaign especially at young people. Resumen La pandemia de Covid-19 trajo consigo enormes retos en la gestión de crisis para entes democráticos como la Unión Europea (UE). Con el fin de lograr una salida económica y social de la crisis, las instituciones comunitarias han promovido el programa NextGenerationEU (NGEU), un fondo de recuperación masivo destinado a ese propósito. Esta acción se produce en un momento de fuerte visibilidad del euroescepticismo, situado dentro de un fenómeno global de desconfianza en las autoridades políticas. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo conocer la articulación de la esfera pública europea cuando NGEU se puso en marcha. En primer lugar, se describe la evolución del respaldo a la UE durante la pandemia, analizando los posibles factores que intervienen en dicha variable. Para ello se aplica un análisis secundario de datos sobre distintas oleadas del Eurobarómetro (EB 92, 93, 94 y 95). Se emplea además el método estadístico para extraer elementos que determinan la imagen de la UE. Por su parte, se profundiza en la difusión comunicativa de este plan mediante entrevistas semiestructuradas a algunos de los profesionales que se ocupan de dicha tarea. La pretensión es brindar una panorámica de cómo se configura el espacio público que conforman ciudadanos e instituciones ante un momento de relevancia simbólica. Los resultados revelan una tendencia hacia una mayor positividad con la UE tras la pandemia. Sin embargo, entre otros posibles factores, el grado de apoyo depende del posicionamiento ideológico y, en menor medida, del tipo de territorio donde habita el individuo. Los funcionarios comunitarios valoran ese auge del europeísmo como una oportunidad, dirigiendo la campaña de comunicación de NGEU especialmente a los jóvenes.
The concept of public spheres is based on the classic notion of deliberative democracy. The emergence of a European Public Sphere (EPS) at the European Union (EU) level has been widely discussed in the literature. However, the deliberative quality of this sphere is questioned because of its weak connection with citizens. This chapter explores how recent research addresses the EPS. Three categories are defined: (1) political and public communication of the EU, (2) citizen participation through technologies, and (3) the growing politicization and polarization of the European project. The methods in use, as well as remaining challenges in research, are also analyzed. This study contributes to discussions on the future of EU democracy, arguing that politicization and the interrelation of digital platforms and legacy media may enhance a true public discussion in Europe.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.