2020
DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2020.1852231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU economic governance and Covid-19: policy learning and windows of opportunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…124-125). It is plausible that the German position was essential to determine the responses to Covid-19 (Ladi & Tsarouhas, 2020, p. 1052), but such an assumption reinforces our argument on the permanence of institutional mechanisms, allowing the economic hegemonic states to be decisive actors. Despite the different results, the institutional status quo hasn't changed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…124-125). It is plausible that the German position was essential to determine the responses to Covid-19 (Ladi & Tsarouhas, 2020, p. 1052), but such an assumption reinforces our argument on the permanence of institutional mechanisms, allowing the economic hegemonic states to be decisive actors. Despite the different results, the institutional status quo hasn't changed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…1180Schmidt ( -1182 reminds that if the historical tracing of responses to critical junctures based on rational choice and constructivist approaches can provide explanations for policy change, that is only a partial analysis, insufficient to demonstrate if there was a reframing of institutional mechanisms and constitutional norms by the actors. If we agree that Covid-19 has resulted in policy-learning, we put into question if political ideology was a factor for policy shift and the change of Germany's position, as Ladi andTsarouhas argue (2020, p. 1045). We tried to demonstrate that it was the particularity of the Covid-19 crisis that posed hegemonic actors in a non-alternative solution, or the possibility of the alternative solution being too dangerous for the survival of the EU, the single market, and thus for national economic growth strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Albu et al estimated a decrease of the global GDP in 2020 up to 14.6% and in the EU between 7.4% and 9.3%, while in Romania, the GDP reduction could be between 5% and 7.9% [24]. In order to cope with the effects of the current pandemic, governments and EU institutions implemented a socio-economic recovery plan including joint debt issuance and a policy of intra-state financial redistribution, indirect redistribution across states, direct economic support to the most affected states and regions, fiscal prudence, and deficit spending [25]. However, according to O'Donoghue et al, despite the increased social benefits and the decline in tax rate, income inequality has continued to rise during the COVID crisis, suggesting the need for improving income-support policies [26].…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%