2023
DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1119442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU regulation of gene-edited plants—A reform proposal

Abstract: This article presents a proposal on how the European Union’s regulatory framework on genetically modified (GM) plants should be reformed in light of recent developments in genomic plant breeding techniques. The reform involves a three-tier system reflecting the genetic changes and resulting traits of GM plants. The article is intended to contribute to the ongoing debate over how best to regulate plant gene editing techniques in the EU.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, under current legislation any deletion, even single base-pair deletions induced by CRISPR/Cas9 are still considered GMO in several areas of the world including the EU. However, deletions of genomic DNA induced by genome editing may be regulated as conventional plants in the future within EU countries [15,17]. This protocol may also be adapted for genome editing of other wild Solanum species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, under current legislation any deletion, even single base-pair deletions induced by CRISPR/Cas9 are still considered GMO in several areas of the world including the EU. However, deletions of genomic DNA induced by genome editing may be regulated as conventional plants in the future within EU countries [15,17]. This protocol may also be adapted for genome editing of other wild Solanum species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutants are likely to have a higher level of customer acceptance and use of the biomass will be subject to fewer restrictions. Most countries outside the EU do not regulate transgene-free gene edited organism as GMOs [33], and the EU is currently establishing a new regulatory framework for this type of mutants [34]. Screening of transformants for CRISPR/Cas9induced mutations resulted in the identification of two zep2 and two zep3 knockout lines containing indels of different sizes causing frameshift mutations (Figure 2).…”
Section: Crispr/cas9-generated Zep2 and Zep3 Knockout Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutants are likely to have a higher level of customer acceptance, and the use of the biomass will be subject to fewer restrictions. Most countries outside the EU do not regulate transgene-free gene-edited organisms as GMOs [33], and the EU is currently establishing a new regulatory framework for this type of mutant [34]. Screening of transformants for CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations resulted in the identification of two zep2 and two zep3 knockout lines containing indels of different sizes causing frameshift mutations (Figure 3).…”
Section: Crispr/cas9-generated Zep2 and Zep3 Knockout Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%