EU Trade Policy Reaction to the BIC: From Accommodation to Entrenchment

García-Durán, Patricia; Millet, Montserrat; Orbie, Jan

doi:10.1057/978-1-137-54758-3_5

Cited by 17 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even during the moratorium years of favouring the multilateral approach, the EU continued to negotiate bilateral agreements (those negotiations that had been started beforehand). However, EU economic interests were served by multilateral agreements, while non-economic ones were achieved through bilateral talks [garcia-Duran et al, 2016]. The actual economic effects of the signed PTAs are currently difficult to estimate -some are still in the early stages of implementation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regionalizacja zagranicznej polityki handlowej Unii Europejskiej w latach 1990 -2017

Wojtas

Kątski

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Regionalizacja polityki handlowej jest w XXI wieku coraz powszechniejszym trendem. Unia Europejska zawierała pierwsze umowy handlowe już w latach 70. XX wieku jednak pod koniec lat 90. XX wieku stosowała swoiste moratorium na tego typu porozumienia. Po 2005 roku ta polityka została zmieniona, a UE jest sygnatariuszem 35 porozumień o charakterze strefy wolnego handlu lub unii celnej.<strong> </strong>Celem pracy jest pokazanie jak zmieniło się podejście Unii Europejskiej do zawierania preferencyjnych układów handlowych w analizowanym okresie 1990 -2017. Przedstawione zostaną przyczyny wzrostu zainteresowania UE regionalizacją oraz rozwój powiązań regionalnych z partnerami w różnych regionach świata, w tym wybrane najważniejsze umowy handlowe.</p>

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regionalizacja zagranicznej polityki handlowej Unii Europejskiej w latach 1990 -2017

Wojtas

Kątski

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparative Grand Strategy

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of grand strategy has historically been confined to a few great powers—preponderantly, the United States, China, and Russia. In contrast, this volume introduces readers to the novel field of “comparative grand strategy.” Its co-editors offer a framework that expands the analysis beyond a traditional rationalist approach to incorporate significant cultural factors that influence strategists as they prioritize threats and opportunities in the global system. This framework then combines these factors with domestic political influences often understated or overlooked in the international relations literature. It considers both how grand strategy is actually formulated and the varied instruments used to implement it. Applying this framework, the volume’s remaining contributors then examine how grand strategy is conceived, formulated, and implemented by ten states. These consist of the United Nations G5 members and five other states “pivotal” to global or regional economic development and security. This group is composed of Brazil and India—two regional powers operating in very different security environments—and Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, who confront each other in a truly existential conflict. Departing from a state-based analysis, an eleventh case study examines the European Union—an organization that lacks many of the trappings of a conventional state but which is able to call upon more resources than most. The volume’s concluding chapter points to both the theoretical and empirical areas of convergence and divergence highlighted by these chapters, and the prospective questions for future analysis in the emergent field of comparative grand strategy.

show abstract

Copyright Page

2019

Comparative Grand Strategy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

EU Trade Policy Reaction to the BIC: From Accommodation to Entrenchment

Cited by 17 publications

References 22 publications

Regionalizacja zagranicznej polityki handlowej Unii Europejskiej w latach 1990 -2017

Regionalizacja zagranicznej polityki handlowej Unii Europejskiej w latach 1990 -2017

Comparative Grand Strategy

Copyright Page

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About