2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU-wide monitoring of biological hazards along the food chain: achievements, challenges and EFSA vision for the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data originating from the reporting obligations of MS under the EU regulation on microbiological criteria (EC No 2073/2005) lack harmonisation, because, although the matrices sampled are harmonised and the sampling and analytical methods are harmonised to a certain extent, the sampling objectives, the place of sampling and the sampling frequency vary or are interpreted differently between MS and according to food types. As such, these data are not comparable across MS (Boelaert et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The data originating from the reporting obligations of MS under the EU regulation on microbiological criteria (EC No 2073/2005) lack harmonisation, because, although the matrices sampled are harmonised and the sampling and analytical methods are harmonised to a certain extent, the sampling objectives, the place of sampling and the sampling frequency vary or are interpreted differently between MS and according to food types. As such, these data are not comparable across MS (Boelaert et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In accordance with the categorisation proposed by Boelaert et al (2016) of the zoonoses monitoring data and possible analyses, tularaemia data (category III for animal data) generated by non-EU harmonised monitoring schemes and reported to EFSA from a very limited number of EU MS and with a limited amount of tested samples preclude trend watching and trend analysis and they only allow a descriptive summary. Inference on the occurrence and prevalence of F. tularensis at animal level in the EU cannot be drawn from these data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring data from animals on F. tularensis are voluntarily submitted by MS and EFTA countries to EFSA. The data are collected without harmonised design at the EU level and only allow for descriptive summaries and not for trend analyses and trend watching (Boelaert et al, 2016). 6.3. Results 6.3.1.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data analyses can either be a descriptive summary, or trend watching, or a full trend analysis. To make this clear for the reader, EFSA proposed throughout the report the types of analyses according to Table 1 and adapted from Boelaert et al (2016). For each chapter in this report, the applied category according to Table 1 is explained.…”
Section: Data Analysis General Principles and Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%