2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eucalyptus and Pinus stand density effects on soil carbon sequestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…What was rather surprising was the rapidity of the restoration of SOC pools of degraded land induced by eucalyptus forestry (i.e. 0.8-2.4 Mg ha −1 year −1 ) because, even if plantations with species of the Eucalyptus genus are generally good at storing organic carbon in soils (Li et al 2012;Boca et al 2014), this is far from being always the case (Du et al 2015;Hernández et al 2016b). We explain such a high rate of SOC accumulation as a consequence of the The index of soil degradation scales from 0 (i.e.…”
Section: Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What was rather surprising was the rapidity of the restoration of SOC pools of degraded land induced by eucalyptus forestry (i.e. 0.8-2.4 Mg ha −1 year −1 ) because, even if plantations with species of the Eucalyptus genus are generally good at storing organic carbon in soils (Li et al 2012;Boca et al 2014), this is far from being always the case (Du et al 2015;Hernández et al 2016b). We explain such a high rate of SOC accumulation as a consequence of the The index of soil degradation scales from 0 (i.e.…”
Section: Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the long-term, increasing planting density in poplar plantations is expected to cause macronutrient depletion in the soil, a decrease in the shoot to root ratio at the stand-level, and an increase in soil C stocks [28][29][30][31]33,34]. However, past afforestation studies with fast-growing Pinus and Eucalyptus species have found little evidence of a planting density effect on soil C [14,35], despite the fact that higher planting density tends to increase total belowground C allocation on the short-term [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hernández et al . (), in their study in Uruguay, concluded that carbon sequestration rate in an afforested site is greater than native pasture and agriculture systems. There were also differences between different organs of trees and species on different horizons of soil and aboveground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%