2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00205-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eucalyptus globulus harvest residue management effects on soil carbon and microbial biomass at 1 and 5 years after plantation establishment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
37
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increasing evidence that microbial properties could be used as potential indicators of impacts of forest management practices on soil (Mendham et al, 2002;Li et al, 2004). In fact, several authors consider that the ratio of the soil microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon, soil microbial biomass nitrogen, the metabolic quotient and soil enzyme activities are reliable indicators of changes in soil management compared to total organic C and N, which are unresponsive over short periods (Powlson et al, 1987;Mendham et al, 2002;Li et al, 2004;Caldwell, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that microbial properties could be used as potential indicators of impacts of forest management practices on soil (Mendham et al, 2002;Li et al, 2004). In fact, several authors consider that the ratio of the soil microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon, soil microbial biomass nitrogen, the metabolic quotient and soil enzyme activities are reliable indicators of changes in soil management compared to total organic C and N, which are unresponsive over short periods (Powlson et al, 1987;Mendham et al, 2002;Li et al, 2004;Caldwell, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in soil bulk density between different LULC types affect comparisons of SOC and total nitrogen stocks by influencing the amount of soils that are sampled from a fixed soil depth (Mendham et al, 2002;Solomon et al, 2002). The changes in soil organic carbon as result of converting natural forests to agricultural land uses could be inflated by the differences in bulk density (Murty et al, 2002).…”
Section: Determination Of Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil microbial biomass can also react quickly to the changes occurring in nutrient cycling, humidity, temperature, organic matter levels and soil cation availability (Peacock et al, 2001). Insam et al (1991) studied that soil Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC) and Nitrogen (MBN) are the recycling and store pools of soil C and N. Viable soil microbial biomass is integral for aggregate formation, both a source and sink of available nutrients for plants and regulating ecosystems process such as decomposition, energy flow and trace gas fluxes in soil (Peacock et al, 2001;Haubensak et al, 2002;Mendham et al, 2002).…”
Section: Ajesmentioning
confidence: 99%