1997
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euclid and the art of wavelet estimation, Part I: Basic algorithm for noise‐free data

Abstract: An algorithm borrowed from polynomial algebra for finding the common factors of two or more polynomials can be used to find the wavelet that several seismic traces have in common. In the implementation described in this first part of a two‐part work, a matrix is constructed from the autocorrelations and crosscorrelations of these seismic traces. The number of zero eigenvalues of this matrix is equal to the number of samples of the wavelet, and the eigenvectors associated with these eigenvalues are related to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common wavelet for all channels is estimated using the reflectivity estimates from the previous iteration. A minimumenergy wavelet is found subject to matching the data as in the convolution model (1). In the frequency domain, the seismic trace is a product of Fourier transforms of the wavelet and reflectivity series…”
Section: Proposed Blind Deconvolution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common wavelet for all channels is estimated using the reflectivity estimates from the previous iteration. A minimumenergy wavelet is found subject to matching the data as in the convolution model (1). In the frequency domain, the seismic trace is a product of Fourier transforms of the wavelet and reflectivity series…”
Section: Proposed Blind Deconvolution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this test, 20 traces are generated with a sampling frequency of 500 Hz using the reflectivity shown in Figure 1b, which can be downloaded from [29]. The received data 1 In equation (16) of [17] there is a typo for the k-th component of ∇L, which should be in Figure 1c is the convolution of the reflectivity with a Ricker wavelet of center frequency 40 Hz with 50 degrees of phase shift (see Figure 1a) plus additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) of SNR = 10 dB. The SNR adopted in this work for the signal-plus-noise model, i.e., x = s + n is defined as SNR = 10 log 10 s 2…”
Section: Synthetic Data Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, SMBD and other multichannel approaches seek to directly determine the reflectivity (Rietsch, 1997a(Rietsch, , 1997bKaaresen and Taxt, 1998;Kazemi and Sacchi, 2014). As we will see, this difference also helps to explain the reduced computational complexity of our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Of particular interest to this paper are the so-called multichannel blind deconvolution methods (Wiggins, 1978;Xu et al, 1995;Inouye and Sato, 1996;Rietsch, 1997aRietsch, , 1997bKaaresen and Taxt, 1998;Ding and Li, 2001;Ram et al, 2010). The term multichannel comes from the fact that these methods are applied when we have several observations of a certain signal, and each observation goes through a different channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use an equation that directly relates P component records to the corresponding SV record for a model subsurface structure. The equation is similar to the concept of multichannel deconvolution proposed in the field of geophysical exploration (Kazemi & Sacchi, 2014;Rietsch, 1997aRietsch, , 1997b. Using this equation, they invert for subsurface seismic velocity structure by performing a direct search over many models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%