1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61123-1_133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euclidean reconstruction: From paraperspective to perspective

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we describe a method to perform Euclidean reconstruction with a perspective camera model. It incrementally performs reconstruction with a paraperspective camera in order to converge towards a perspective model. With respect to other methods that compute shape and motion from a sequence of images with a calibrated perspective camera, this method converges in a few iterations, is computationally efficient, and does not suffer from the non linear nature of the problem. Moreover, the behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there is no noise in the 2D image coordinates, W is rank 4 and cr5 = • • =N = 0 , V1 diag(01, . .,a4)UJ is a full rank factorization of W. Therefore Q = V1 , X = diag(o1,.,r4)UJ (4) The above factorization method can only be used ifprojective depths 1u can be found. Now we estimate projective depths LI using genetic algorithm.…”
Section: The Estimation Of Projective Depths Based On Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If there is no noise in the 2D image coordinates, W is rank 4 and cr5 = • • =N = 0 , V1 diag(01, . .,a4)UJ is a full rank factorization of W. Therefore Q = V1 , X = diag(o1,.,r4)UJ (4) The above factorization method can only be used ifprojective depths 1u can be found. Now we estimate projective depths LI using genetic algorithm.…”
Section: The Estimation Of Projective Depths Based On Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the most crucial problem in perspective factorization is how to estimate these projective depths. In 1996, Christy [4] proposed a method for shape recovery from projective images in which the projective depths were iteratively estimated by iterating factorization of the measurement matrix starting from the paraperspective camera model. In 1 996, SturmI5J proposed a non-iterative factorization method for uncalibrated perspective images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the approximation error to orthographic projection [6] in the recovered shape may be very large. Therefore, various improved factorization method by avoiding the orthographic projection have been proposed, such as using the paraperspective projection [7] , or the perspective projection [8] . However, those are still suffered by the approximation of 1 Supported by Doctoral Found of QUST(0022408) the camera model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factorization based method [1] which can eliminate the projection error due to affine approximation of perspective projection was used to estimate motion and shape from motion trajectories of feature points. 62 feature points on sphere and motion trajectoies of them obtained from synthetic motion were used.…”
Section: Synthetic Data: Problem For Improving Accuracy Of Motion Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…False matching leads to outliers in the feature motion trajectory. The effect of outliers must be reduced to yield good data for subsequent processing such as shape from motion [1] [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%