2022
DOI: 10.1177/00905917221095084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eugene Debs and the Socialist Republic

Abstract: I reconstruct the civic republican foundations of Eugene Debs’s socialist critique of capitalism, demonstrating how he uses a neo-roman conception of freedom to condemn waged labour. Debs is also shown to build upon this neo-roman liberty in his socialist republican objections to the plutocratic capture of the law and threats of violence faced by the labour movement. This Debsian socialist republicanism can be seen to rest on an ambitious understanding of the demands of citizen sovereignty and civic solidarity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 9. For example, there are good studies showing that radical democratic innovations need to be supported by progressive social movement to be effective (Felicetti and Della Porta 2019). Others – plausibly republicans of a more socialist sort (e.g., O’Shea 2020a, 2022; Vrousalis 2019) – might argue that, if practices of democracy redistributing power in the economic sphere are not already in place, CSIs might be toothless against fighting oligarchization. While I do see the appeal of these points, I also believe that they run the risk of engaging in a chicken-and-egg mode of thinking that is problematic in the context of discussing egalitarian social change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9. For example, there are good studies showing that radical democratic innovations need to be supported by progressive social movement to be effective (Felicetti and Della Porta 2019). Others – plausibly republicans of a more socialist sort (e.g., O’Shea 2020a, 2022; Vrousalis 2019) – might argue that, if practices of democracy redistributing power in the economic sphere are not already in place, CSIs might be toothless against fighting oligarchization. While I do see the appeal of these points, I also believe that they run the risk of engaging in a chicken-and-egg mode of thinking that is problematic in the context of discussing egalitarian social change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%