1987
DOI: 10.2514/3.45431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euler calculations for flowfield of a helicopter rotor in hover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jameson [1][2][3] has developed high accuracy, low dissipation schemes for fixed-wing applications while Sheffer et al 4 showed that the performance of these numerical schemes in the calculation of helicopter flows are robust and accurate. A lot of work has been done in the field of helicopter simulation in the past decades ranging from potential flow calculations (Caradonna & Isom,5,6 Caradonna & Philippe 7 ), Euler and Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations (Agarwal & Deese, 8,9 Srinivasan et al, 10,11 Allen, 12-16 Pomin & Wagner [17][18][19] ), and hybrid methods (Hassan et al, 20 Bhagwat et al 21,22 ), just to name a few. Most of the aforementioned computations employed some form of implicit time stepping scheme, mostly the dual time stepping scheme first introduced by Jameson. 23 While this has proved to be accurate for helicopter simulation, the time and computational resources required to compute a complete rotor in forward flight is very high, especially if the aeroelastic effects are to be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jameson [1][2][3] has developed high accuracy, low dissipation schemes for fixed-wing applications while Sheffer et al 4 showed that the performance of these numerical schemes in the calculation of helicopter flows are robust and accurate. A lot of work has been done in the field of helicopter simulation in the past decades ranging from potential flow calculations (Caradonna & Isom,5,6 Caradonna & Philippe 7 ), Euler and Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations (Agarwal & Deese, 8,9 Srinivasan et al, 10,11 Allen, 12-16 Pomin & Wagner [17][18][19] ), and hybrid methods (Hassan et al, 20 Bhagwat et al 21,22 ), just to name a few. Most of the aforementioned computations employed some form of implicit time stepping scheme, mostly the dual time stepping scheme first introduced by Jameson. 23 While this has proved to be accurate for helicopter simulation, the time and computational resources required to compute a complete rotor in forward flight is very high, especially if the aeroelastic effects are to be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the static angle was set at 15 degrees, 20 degrees and 25 degrees, the dynamic angle of attack for the last 3 inches of the rotor blade is less than zero and produces drag and no lift [9].…”
Section: Net Dynamic Angle Of Attack Along the Blade Leading Edgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was followed by the use of the Euler equations [35] and with increase in computational power, codes which solved the Navier-Stokes equations [36]. A common strand to all these solution schemes was the use of wake models to compute the induced effects of the rotor and these methods are also referred to as wakecoupled methods.…”
Section: Computational Workmentioning
confidence: 99%