“…Jameson [1][2][3] has developed high accuracy, low dissipation schemes for fixed-wing applications while Sheffer et al 4 showed that the performance of these numerical schemes in the calculation of helicopter flows are robust and accurate. A lot of work has been done in the field of helicopter simulation in the past decades ranging from potential flow calculations (Caradonna & Isom,5,6 Caradonna & Philippe 7 ), Euler and Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations (Agarwal & Deese, 8,9 Srinivasan et al, 10,11 Allen, 12-16 Pomin & Wagner [17][18][19] ), and hybrid methods (Hassan et al, 20 Bhagwat et al 21,22 ), just to name a few. Most of the aforementioned computations employed some form of implicit time stepping scheme, mostly the dual time stepping scheme first introduced by Jameson. 23 While this has proved to be accurate for helicopter simulation, the time and computational resources required to compute a complete rotor in forward flight is very high, especially if the aeroelastic effects are to be considered.…”