2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2010.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euler class groups and a theorem of Roitman

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe define the Euler class group of a polynomial algebra in lower codimension and prove an analogue of a result of Roitman (on projective modules) for the Euler class groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using ([2], 4.11, 5.7), (2.2) and following the proof of ( [4], Theorem 4.2), we can prove the following result. This result is also proved in ( [6], Theorem 3.1). Note that regularity of the ring is used only when 2n = d + 3.…”
Section: Euler Class Groupssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Using ([2], 4.11, 5.7), (2.2) and following the proof of ( [4], Theorem 4.2), we can prove the following result. This result is also proved in ( [6], Theorem 3.1). Note that regularity of the ring is used only when 2n = d + 3.…”
Section: Euler Class Groupssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We now note that S = k[Z 1 , · · · , Z d ] (Z 1 ,Z 2 ,··· ,φ(Z d )) , where k is the residue field of W , which is same as the residue field of R and is infinite. Therefore, applying (4.2), we conclude that α 1 , · · · , α n can be lifted to a set of n generators of L. We can now apply [DS,Proposition 3.3] to see that there exist γ 1 , · · · , γ n such that I 1 = (γ 1 , · · · , γ n ) where γ i − α i ∈ I 1 2 . We note that such a conclusion holds trivially if L is not…”
Section: The Case Of Dvrmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Proof. Following the proof of Das-Sridharan [8,Theorem 2.11] where it is proved for regular A and use (7.7).…”
Section: Lifting Surjectionmentioning
confidence: 99%