1970
DOI: 10.1119/1.1976373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euler Potentials

Abstract: The representation of a magnetic field by the cross product of the gradients of two scalars has recently seen wide use in plasma physics and in the study of energetic particles in space. The properties of such a representation are reviewed and examples of its application are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolutions are essentially 1) compromising the momentum-conserving force slightly in order to attain partial momentum-conservation but stability; 2) formulating dissipation terms for MHD following Monaghan (1997) (see ; 3) deriving the variable smoothing length formulation from a Lagrangian and 4) using prevention not cure by formulating the magnetic field in a divergence free form using the 'Euler potentials' α E and β E such that B = ∇α E × ∇β E . The latter has the further advantage that the Lagrangian evolution of these potentials for ideal MHD is zero, corresponding to the advection of magnetic field lines (Stern 1970), although there are also disadvantages to their use. In practise we add artificial dissipation terms to the Euler potentials' evolution in order to resolve (and dissipate) strong gradients in the magnetic field (see Price and is here applied to star formation problems for the first time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolutions are essentially 1) compromising the momentum-conserving force slightly in order to attain partial momentum-conservation but stability; 2) formulating dissipation terms for MHD following Monaghan (1997) (see ; 3) deriving the variable smoothing length formulation from a Lagrangian and 4) using prevention not cure by formulating the magnetic field in a divergence free form using the 'Euler potentials' α E and β E such that B = ∇α E × ∇β E . The latter has the further advantage that the Lagrangian evolution of these potentials for ideal MHD is zero, corresponding to the advection of magnetic field lines (Stern 1970), although there are also disadvantages to their use. In practise we add artificial dissipation terms to the Euler potentials' evolution in order to resolve (and dissipate) strong gradients in the magnetic field (see Price and is here applied to star formation problems for the first time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This knowledge comes from the fact that the magnetic field at the Earth's surface can be assumed to be overwhelmingly due to internal Earth sources [Tsyganenko, 1990]. By only taking into account the highly-dominant dipole term on the Earth's surface, we simply have α ≡ φ on the Earth's surface [e.g., Stern, 1970]. This boundary condition is approximately correct even when we do not extend the domain down to the Earth's surface, but only to a sphere of radius r enveloping the Earth, with r not too large.…”
Section: Inverse Representation; Iterative Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each point in the ionosphere is specified using Euler potentials a and b [Northrop and Teller, 1960;Stern, 1970], which are assumed not to vary in time, for a fixed point in the ionosphere. Since the RCM grid is also fixed in the ionosphere, each grid point is characterized by values of a and b that do not change in time.…”
Section: A1 Inductive Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%