2010
DOI: 10.3917/poeu.030.0067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Europe between integration and globalisation social differences and national frames in the analysis of focus groups conducted in France, francophone Belgium and the United Kingdom

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour L'Harmattan. © L'Harmattan. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…White (2009) argues that survey respondents may have difficulties in relating to abstract concepts such as ‘identity’ or ‘attachment’. Equally, Duchesne et al . (2010) claim that quantitative surveys tend to create an artefact of European identity as ordinary people would not relate to the EU if not explicitly asked in survey questions.…”
Section: European Identitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…White (2009) argues that survey respondents may have difficulties in relating to abstract concepts such as ‘identity’ or ‘attachment’. Equally, Duchesne et al . (2010) claim that quantitative surveys tend to create an artefact of European identity as ordinary people would not relate to the EU if not explicitly asked in survey questions.…”
Section: European Identitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(2010) claim that quantitative surveys tend to create an artefact of European identity as ordinary people would not relate to the EU if not explicitly asked in survey questions. Indeed, to fully grasp the dynamics of identity change in an integrating Europe, it is best to combine insights from experiments (Bruter, 2005; Cram et al ., 2011), focus groups (Duchesne et al ., 2010), qualitative interviews (White, 2009) and anthropological research (Bellier and Wilson, 2000). Bearing these caveats in mind, I believe that quantitative analyses of European identity contribute to our knowledge by pointing to broader patterns of identity change that cannot be detected in small‐n studies.…”
Section: European Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a way, they constitute the data as much as do the transcripts themselves. Our first results are indeed a comparison of these narratives (Duchesne et al, 2000), according to our double segmentation, national and social. Content analysis came second, along with more specific discourse analyses.…”
Section: Analyzing : Looking At Alliancesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…xx Indeed, most of the publications that resulted from our focus groups analysis address the topic itself (Duchesne et al, 2000;Duchesne et al, 2013;Van Ingelgom, 2014)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, French citizens have gained a new political community and have become accustomed to it, in a way that does not particularly meet the expectations of modernity that Europe integration could have raised. Citizens have come to accept Europe as an inevitable but stable reality, and to consider themselves European as a consequence of being French (Bozec 2010, Duchesne & al 2010, Throssell 2010, Van Ingelgom 2010, Weil 2010. French identity is clearly the link between citizens and the European Union; they see the EU through the lens of the nation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Europe As a Missed Opportunity For A New Step Tomentioning
confidence: 99%