Europe, Knowledge, Politics — Engaging with the Limits: The c.a.s.e. collective Responds

Aradau, Claudia; Bell, Colleen; Bonditti, Philippe; Davidshofer, Stephan; Guillaume, Xavier; Huysmans, Jef; Jeandesboz, Julien; Jutila, Matti; McCormack, Tara; Neal, Andrew W.; Olsson, Christian; Squire, Vicki; Stritzel, Holger; Munster, Rens van; Williams, Michael C.

doi:10.1177/0967010607085002

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Because this legitimate power emanates from the sovereign, this creates the necessity to analyze the conditions of its application. 54 Reflections on exceptionality and its consequential constraints on freedom can be associated with the analysis of surveillance techniques and its consequences. The EU research project funded by the 7th Framework Programme for Research "Challenge: Liberty & Security" 55 is one of the most prominent attempts in recent years to comprehend how the discourse of insecurity and surveillance technologies affects the limits of citizen freedom (first of all in the EU) 56 .…”

Section: Security and Exceptionalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Security Studies in the 21st Century: Any Directions for Lithuanian Security Studies?

Jakniūnaitė¹

2014

Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article focuses on recent developments and discussions in the field of security studies and aims to suggest new guidelines for the research of Lithuanian security policy. First it covers the main subjects of contemporary security discourse; next it provides evaluation and review of the critical tradition in security studies that frames presuppositions and is the means for analyzing specific security issues as well as that which fosters reflexive thinking about security. The third part deals with three topics of security research (analysis of security through the concepts of risk, exceptionality and media) which have become talking-points in recent years and which have provided innovative insights in security studies.

show abstract

Section: Security and Exceptionalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Security Studies in the 21st Century: Any Directions for Lithuanian Security Studies?

Jakniūnaitė¹

2014

Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kadangi ši legitimi galia kyla iš suvereniteto (valdžios), atsiranda būtinybė analizuoti sąlygas, kaip ji yra pritaikoma ir kokiu būdu bei mastu. 55 Mąstymas apie ypatingumą, iš jo kylančius laisvės suvaržymus siejasi su stebėjimo (angl. surveillance) technikų ir jų pasekmių analize.…”

Section: Saugumas Ir Ypatingumasunclassified

Kritinės saugumo studijos XXI amžiuje: kur kreipti Lietuvos saugumo politikos tyrimus?

Jakniūnaitė¹

2014

Lietuvos Metinė Strateginė Apžvalga

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…See, for example,Booth (2005a).8 The title is taken from the first section heading in the Epilogue(Campbell, 1998a, p. 207). 9 The Collective appears serious about the collective nature of the enterprise, as the Rejoinder piece published the next year under its name identified only 16 authors, and some had not been part of the original Collective (CASE Collective, 2007)…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

My Critique is Bigger than Yours: Constituting Exclusions in Critical Security Studies

Mutimer

2009

SSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Critical Security Studies proceeds from the premise that words are world-making, that is that the ways we think about security are constitutive of the worlds of security we analyse. Turned to conventional security studies and the practices of global politics, this critical insight has revealed the ways in which the exclusions that are the focus of this conference have been produced. Perhaps most notable in this regard has been David Campbell's work, showing how the theory and practice of security are an identity discourse producing both insides and outsides, but the production of excluded others is a theme that runs through the critical scholarship on security in the past decade or more. This article turns the critical security studies gaze on itself, to explore the field's own complicity in the production of exclusions. The article reads three important instances of critical security studies for the inclusions and exclusions they produce: Ken Booth's Theory of World Securitv, the epilogue to David Campbell's Writing Security, and the CASE Collective Manifesto. The article concludes by asking about the nature of the inclusions and exclusions these divisions produce and the politics which those exclusions, in turn, (re)produce.

show abstract

Europe, Knowledge, Politics — Engaging with the Limits: The c.a.s.e. collective Responds

Cited by 12 publications

References 23 publications

Critical Security Studies in the 21st Century: Any Directions for Lithuanian Security Studies?

Critical Security Studies in the 21st Century: Any Directions for Lithuanian Security Studies?

Kritinės saugumo studijos XXI amžiuje: kur kreipti Lietuvos saugumo politikos tyrimus?

My Critique is Bigger than Yours: Constituting Exclusions in Critical Security Studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About