2014
DOI: 10.18352/ulr.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Agencies for Criminal Justice and Shared Enforcement<br>(Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office)

Abstract: council-cosi-jha-agency-heads-24-11-11-18075-11.pdf> (last visited 17 November 2014). 3 We do not list here the European Judicial Network (EJN) as it is basically a horizontal network and cannot be qualified as an European agency; Joint Action 98/428/JHA of 29 June 1998 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the creation of a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comprehensive analysis by Luchtman and Vervaele (2014) of the legislative proposals to create the European Public Prosecutor's Office shows various challenges when building a system of shared enforcement in the field of criminal justice. Creating such a system may negatively affect established requirements in every criminal justice system (accessibility and foreseeability), but may also give rise other questions.…”
Section: Organization Of Shared Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive analysis by Luchtman and Vervaele (2014) of the legislative proposals to create the European Public Prosecutor's Office shows various challenges when building a system of shared enforcement in the field of criminal justice. Creating such a system may negatively affect established requirements in every criminal justice system (accessibility and foreseeability), but may also give rise other questions.…”
Section: Organization Of Shared Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, whereas the enforcement jurisdiction of national authorities is bound by national borders, which could hinder cross‐border investigations, the territorial competences of EU authorities can include joint territories of all the participating MS. Depending on their specific institutional designs, these advantages gain even greater weight when time consuming schemes for mutual legal (administrative or criminal law) assistance are removed from their legal design (Luchtman and Vervaele, ).…”
Section: Proliferation Of Eeas – Functional Spillover?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is is not to say that no progress exists within the dimensions of criminal law and judicial cooperation in the EU. However, there are some legal and practical problems with integration of anti-criminal agencies into the national legal orders of the member states (see Luchtman & Vervaele, 2014). Th erefore, national authorities must act more eff ectively against international crime.…”
Section: The Slovakian Authorities In Jariabka's Casementioning
confidence: 99%