2018
DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1542768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European disintegration? Euroscepticism and Europe’s rural/urban divide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome might reflect an association between discontent and the great vulnerabilityrepresented by the lack of access to services and opportunities-that low socioeconomic status groups usually face. This finding is in line with the mainstream literature that uses income per capita as a measure of socioeconomic status to study discontent, mainly in the European context (see, for example, Dijkstra et al, 2020;Gordon, 2018;Schoene, 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The outcome might reflect an association between discontent and the great vulnerabilityrepresented by the lack of access to services and opportunities-that low socioeconomic status groups usually face. This finding is in line with the mainstream literature that uses income per capita as a measure of socioeconomic status to study discontent, mainly in the European context (see, for example, Dijkstra et al, 2020;Gordon, 2018;Schoene, 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results for age and for secondary and higher education levels are not statistically significant, Zmerli and Cartillo (2015). Only primary education is found to have a decreasing effect on discontent, marking a difference with the literature for Europe where low levels of education have the opposite effect (Abreu and Öner, 2020;Dijkstra et al, 2020;Gordon, 2018;Schoene, 2019). This, however, is not completely unexpected.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The proportion of the variance explained by the regions and countries is low with countries accounting for 10% and regions adding 7%. This means that individual-level factors are decisive in understanding Euroscepticism, as argued by previous studies (e.g., Hooghe and Marks 2004;Braun and Tausendpfund 2014;Schoene 2019). The second model summarises the effect of individuallevel predictors.…”
Section: Spatial Disparities: Multilevel Causation Along the Regionalmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The analysis of contextual factors, however, cannot stop at the national level but needs to break down countries into regions. Previous studies have highlighted already that levels of Euroscepticism diverge between regions (Lubbers and Scheepers 2005;Schraff 2019;Schoene 2019). For analytic purposes, the analysis of the regional level is important because social conditions within nation states vary considerably, for example, with regard to economic performance, household income or social inequality structures (Heidenreich and Wunder 2008;Geppert and Stephan 2008;Petrakos, Kallioras and Anagnostou 2011;Heidenreich 2016a).…”
Section: Spatial Disparities: Multilevel Causation Along the Regionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rural-urban divide now represents geographic differences: a segregation of prospering cities and the declining periphery (Deegan-Krause, 2007;Ford and Jennings, 2020). Differences in social structural status, employment as well as sociocultural values and beliefs result in differences in attitudes towards domestic social issues (Kelly and Lobao, 2019), economic development (Harriss and Moore, 2017), political engagement (Thananithichot, 2012), the level of euroscepticism (Schoene, 2019) and importantly, political preferences (Clem and Craumer, 2002;Evans, 2006;Mcgrane et al, 2017;Rodden, 2019).…”
Section: Agricultural Policymentioning
confidence: 99%