2007
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts)

Abstract: Level of evidence A Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials or meta-analyses Level of evidence B Data derived from a single randomized clinical trial or large non-randomized studies Level of evidence C Consensus of opinion of the experts and/ or small studies, retrospective studies, registries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
449
1
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,257 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 653 publications
6
449
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was defined according to the guidelines of the American Diabetes Association 30. Hypercholesterolemia was defined according to the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice 31. Cigarette smoking habit was established according to self‐report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was defined according to the guidelines of the American Diabetes Association 30. Hypercholesterolemia was defined according to the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice 31. Cigarette smoking habit was established according to self‐report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence to lifestyle and risk factor modification requires individualized behavioural education and can be implemented during exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. Education should be interactive with full participation of patient care-givers, providing an explanation for each intervention while early mobilization and physical conditioning programme should vary according to individual clinical status (Table 38) [261,263]. Adherence to the prescribed recommendations and the achievement of the planned goals should be evaluated during regular clinical evaluation (at 6-month intervals).…”
Section: Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special attention should be given to puncture site healing, haemodynamics, and possible anaemia or CIN. For ACS patients, plasma lipids should be re-evaluated 4 6 weeks after an acute event and/or initiation of lipid-lowering therapy to evaluate whether target levels have been achieved and to screen for liver dysfunction; the second plasma lipid control should be scheduled at 3 months [263]. For patients with stable CAD, there is a need to evaluate muscle symptoms and enzymes initially after statin introduction, then to evaluate muscle symptoms .…”
Section: Strategies For Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAFEHEART is an open, multicentre, long‐term prospective cohort study including patients with clinical and genetic diagnosis of heterozygous FH 39, 40 and relatives with negative genetic testing for FH, without or with secondary hypercholesterolaemia. Baseline characteristics of the cohort population have been previously described 38.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, FH groups consisted in patients with or without lipid‐lowering treatment (FH‐LLT + , N = 20; FH‐LLT − group, N = 20), but with very high LDL‐c levels in plasma (>180 mg/dl). The FH‐LLT + group included FH cases randomly chosen among those with a stable lipid‐lowering treatment (LLT + ) of at least 1 year before inclusion, according to clinical guidelines 40, 42. FH‐LLT − referred to FH patients who did not receive any lipid‐lowering treatment over the same time period, but matched for LDL‐c levels similar to those from the FH‐ LLT + group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%