2003
DOI: 10.1080/01402380412331300177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European liberal democracy and the principle of state religious neutrality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They provided nationalist movements with a rich set of communicable myths, narratives, and symbols. Overall, they not only contributed significantly to the creation of distinctive and homogeneous nations, but also made religion a more salient part of national identities (Madeley, ; Rokkan, ).…”
Section: Religion In Secular Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provided nationalist movements with a rich set of communicable myths, narratives, and symbols. Overall, they not only contributed significantly to the creation of distinctive and homogeneous nations, but also made religion a more salient part of national identities (Madeley, ; Rokkan, ).…”
Section: Religion In Secular Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This speaks of an imperfect European project of 'cultural conversation', whereby what Coles (2009) identifies as converging Islamic and Western values are yet to be fully recognised by diverse national constituencies. Moreover, this imperfect European project highlights ongoing difficulties in implementing a neutral state, or a moderate secular state (Modood 2010), which has emerged since the mid-1970s within circles of European political philosophers, is broadly connected with the thoughts of John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant and John Locke and is supposedly open to the accommodation of different religions (Madeley 2003). Ongoing cultural frictions in Great Britain over sharia law courts (Zee 2016) and forced marriage (Bonino 2016b) also suggest that the more conservative sections of the Muslim community still struggle to adapt to existing legal frameworks and social norms, thus placing Muslim diversity in a weak position when it seeks to negotiate group-based demands in the contested arenas of security.…”
Section: Beyond Huntington: From Global Clashes To National Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also their answers are, at the bottom of the line, similar: institutional pluralism and theory that proceeds hand in hand with practice, empirically grounded in the real world. Bader and Shachar are certainly not alone in shifting the debate about the relationship between politics and religion from church–state relations to governance (see also: Bramadat and Koenig 2008; Madeley 2003b). What is especially noteworthy about their approach, however, is that they identify very clearly the theoretical and normative stakes in the governance debate in the light of the return of religion and the rise of post‐secular democratic theory (see also: Audi 2000; Parekh 2000).…”
Section: Practical Implications: Governance Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%