2016
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European perspective in Thoracic surgery—eso-coloplasty: when and how?

Abstract: Colon interposition has been used since the beginning of the 20(th) century as a substitute for esophageal replacement. Colon interposition is mainly chosen as a second line treatment when the stomach cannot be used, when the stomach has to be resected for oncological or technical reasons, or when the stomach is deliberately kept intact for benign diseases in young patients with long-life expectancy. During the surgery the vascularization of the colon must be carefully assessed, as well as the type of the graf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several conditions, both congenital and acquired (malignant or benign tumor, in some forms of atresia, caustic lesion, and severe reflux), for which esophageal replacement is needed [1]. The surgical intervention remains the preferred treatment, however alternative options are essential for restoring esophageal continuity and functionality [2][3][4][5]. These alternative approaches may be associated with several complications, such as inflammatory response, scar deposition, stricture formation, and in the most serious cases, they could cause the morbidity of surrounding tissues [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several conditions, both congenital and acquired (malignant or benign tumor, in some forms of atresia, caustic lesion, and severe reflux), for which esophageal replacement is needed [1]. The surgical intervention remains the preferred treatment, however alternative options are essential for restoring esophageal continuity and functionality [2][3][4][5]. These alternative approaches may be associated with several complications, such as inflammatory response, scar deposition, stricture formation, and in the most serious cases, they could cause the morbidity of surrounding tissues [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Anatomic variations are frequent, and aberrations such as absence of the middle colic artery or inadequate vascularization of the splenic flexure are frequent (up to 25%). 9,10 Adequate vascular supply is paramount in the pediatric colorectal surgical patient in whom colonic pedicles are used. In ARM, the pulled through rectum is perfused by the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) blood supply with intramural blood flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colon interposition is the first choice for selected patients with esophageal cancer when the stomach is unavailable or for benign esophageal diseases especially in young patients, with the intent of preserving the stomach[10]. Although long-term results for coloplasty are similar to gastroplasty, the reconstruction with the stomach generally involves a simpler operation with only one anastomosis[11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%