2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
117
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
117
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential shifts in the identity, relationship, attributes or use preferences the forest owner displays in relation to their property, or more broadly in relation to a conception of nature or place, are thereby not easily conceived in unitary categories, but are rather part of complexes encompassing not only location but also valuation related to numerous factors-many subjective-related to place. These types of conceptions of multiple attachments are noted in studies ranging from psychology (Elster 1987) to geography (Tuan 1977;Massey 1994). Acknowledging that urban or new forest owners still keep some bonds and may behave partly like traditional/rural forest owners is thus well in line with understandings that highlight the constructed nature of attachment-that any person's bond to area cannot be understood merely through simplified parameters such as geographical distance or, for instance, "forest owner type" (e.g.…”
Section: Understanding Forest-owner Ruralities In Change: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Potential shifts in the identity, relationship, attributes or use preferences the forest owner displays in relation to their property, or more broadly in relation to a conception of nature or place, are thereby not easily conceived in unitary categories, but are rather part of complexes encompassing not only location but also valuation related to numerous factors-many subjective-related to place. These types of conceptions of multiple attachments are noted in studies ranging from psychology (Elster 1987) to geography (Tuan 1977;Massey 1994). Acknowledging that urban or new forest owners still keep some bonds and may behave partly like traditional/rural forest owners is thus well in line with understandings that highlight the constructed nature of attachment-that any person's bond to area cannot be understood merely through simplified parameters such as geographical distance or, for instance, "forest owner type" (e.g.…”
Section: Understanding Forest-owner Ruralities In Change: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Az erdőtulajdonosok csoportosítása a szakirodalomban mindig az adott vizsgálat céljait és szempontjait követi (Ficko & Lidestav 2017), azonban általánosságban elmondható, hogy az új tulajdonosi csoportok jellemzően kisebb mértékben függenek az erdőből származó jövedelmektől, és nagyobb jelentőséget tulajdonítanak az erdők rekreációs funkcióinak. Caputo & Butler (2017) vizsgálatai szerint az ökoszisztéma szolgáltatások tudatos használata az Amerikai Egyesült Államokban a magán-erdőtulajdonosok igen nagy részét jellemzi, de az ezekből elérhető bevételi lehetőségeket nem használják ki.…”
Section: Az Erdőtulajdonosok Szerepe éS Jelentőségeunclassified
“…The idea is to group together similar "types" of people based on common behavior. This form of dimension reduction leads to a functional typology which, while not describing the individual, represents archetypal patterns of behavior that tend to repeat themselves within the community (Ficko, Ní Dhubháin, Karppinen, & Westin, 2019). AFTs have proven to be useful for modeling human decision-making in a variety of applications, especially in the agricultural sector (Guillem, Barnes, Rounsevell, & Renwick, 2012;Karali, Brunner, Doherty, Hersperger, & Rounsevell, 2013) and in the context of large-scale socio-ecological systems (Arneth, Brown, & Rounsevell, 2014;Rounsevell, Robinson, & Murray-Rust, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%