2015
DOI: 10.1111/ecno.12038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Rating Actions, Investor Reaction, and Bond Spread Volatility

Abstract: This paper uses unit root tests that allow for structural breaks in order to examine the impact of ratings announcements on European bond credit spreads. In general, there are no noticeable reactions to announcements for issues in euros, which comes in contrast to the results of previous studies on US corporate bonds. However, we have noticed a reaction to rating actions for issues in sterling. In the case of a reaction to a downgrade or a negative watch, investor reaction generally occurs before the rating an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our empirical analysis confirms other empirical paths documented in the literature. In particular, we find that downgrades (upgrades) increase (decrease) credit spread and that this effect is more pronounced for downgrades that confirms the findings from several previous studies (see, e.g., Dichev & Piotrosky, 2001;Goh & Ederington, 1993;Grier & Katz, 1976;Hand et al, 1992;Heinke & Steiner, 2001;Hettenhouse & Sartoris, 1976;Hite & Warga, 1997;Holthausen & Leftwich, 1986;May, 2010;McCarthy & Melicher, 1988;Ory & Raimbourg, 2015;Ory et al, 2011;Weinstein, 1977, among others).…”
Section: Related Literaturesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our empirical analysis confirms other empirical paths documented in the literature. In particular, we find that downgrades (upgrades) increase (decrease) credit spread and that this effect is more pronounced for downgrades that confirms the findings from several previous studies (see, e.g., Dichev & Piotrosky, 2001;Goh & Ederington, 1993;Grier & Katz, 1976;Hand et al, 1992;Heinke & Steiner, 2001;Hettenhouse & Sartoris, 1976;Hite & Warga, 1997;Holthausen & Leftwich, 1986;May, 2010;McCarthy & Melicher, 1988;Ory & Raimbourg, 2015;Ory et al, 2011;Weinstein, 1977, among others).…”
Section: Related Literaturesupporting
confidence: 90%