1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-6009(08)80213-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European semi-anthropomorphic phantom for the cross-calibration of peripheral bone densitometers: assessment of precision accuracy and stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to small numbers in some centres, the primary analyses were done with the centres combined by country. To enable a comparison with NHANES 3 US data, all the ESP standardised BMD values were transformed to Hologic QDR 1000W equivalents using ESP cross-calibration parameters [10]. Comparison was then made with the young normal values published by the NHANES III study [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to small numbers in some centres, the primary analyses were done with the centres combined by country. To enable a comparison with NHANES 3 US data, all the ESP standardised BMD values were transformed to Hologic QDR 1000W equivalents using ESP cross-calibration parameters [10]. Comparison was then made with the young normal values published by the NHANES III study [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done as described by Pearson et al [3], Kalender et al [5], and Lunt et al [6]. The minimum acceptable data for inclusion in the study was BMD at one measurement site (from femoral neck, trochanter, or L2-L4 spine), age, weight, and height at/or near the scan date.…”
Section: Dxa Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results were cross-calibrated with the European Spine Phantom. (23) We updated our calibrations with the definitive phantom compared with our previous calibrations (24) with the prototype. These measurements were made either at the time of the first X-ray (13 centers) or at the time of the second X-ray (remaining centers).…”
Section: Determinants Of the Size Of Incident Vertebral Deformitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The machines used were Lunar (Madison, WI, USA), Hologic (Waltham, MA, USA), or Norland (Minster, OH, USA) pencil beam machines, or in one case, a Sopha fan-beam machine. The results were cross-calibrated with the European Spine Phantom.(23) We updated our calibrations with the definitive phantom compared with our previous calibrations (24) with the prototype. These measurements were made either at the time of the first X-ray (13 centers) or at the time of the second X-ray (remaining centers).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%