2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Soil Data Centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
293
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 547 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
293
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…scale and a uniform outcrop depth throughout the majority of the analyzed area. We consider these data more relevant for landslide susceptibility evaluation than the unsystematic soil parent material data of the ESDB (Heineke et al, 1998;Panagos et al, 2012) used for ELSUS 1000. As discussed in Günther et al (2014), soil parent material descriptions over Europe, as derived from the ESDB, are only partly lithological but also genetical and therefore hard to be spatially evaluated.…”
Section: Controlling Factors: Environmental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…scale and a uniform outcrop depth throughout the majority of the analyzed area. We consider these data more relevant for landslide susceptibility evaluation than the unsystematic soil parent material data of the ESDB (Heineke et al, 1998;Panagos et al, 2012) used for ELSUS 1000. As discussed in Günther et al (2014), soil parent material descriptions over Europe, as derived from the ESDB, are only partly lithological but also genetical and therefore hard to be spatially evaluated.…”
Section: Controlling Factors: Environmental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, ELSUS V2: (i) covers a larger area (including Iceland, Cyprus, the Faroe Islands and the Shetland islands) with a higher spatial resolution (200 × 200 m cell size in contrast to the 1 × 1 km resolution of ELSUS 1000); (ii) uses an extended landslide inventory; and (iii) exploits the newly available digital information on shallow subsurface lithology, derived from the International Hydrogeological Map of Europe (IHME) at a 1:1.5 Mil. scale (Duscher et al, 2015), replacing the data set on soil parent material from the European Soil Database (ESDB) (Heineke et al, 1998;Panagos, Van Liedekerke, Jones, & Montanarella, 2012) previously used as a proxy for shallow subsurface lithology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, soil data used by the model were derived from the European Soil Database (ESDB) (King et al, 1994) available at the European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC-http://eusoils.jrc.ec. europa.eu/library/esdac/esdac_access2.cfm) (Panagos et al, 2012). The properties considered for the topsoil layer (0-30 cm) included texture, bulk density, pH, drainage class and rock content.…”
Section: Model and Input Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005;Panagos, P. et al 2012). This types of information requirement generally cannot be fulfi lled with new data collections, at least not on such a level as in the frame of traditional soil surveys (Montanarella, L. 2010).…”
Section: Demands On Spatial Soil Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%