European Tamaricaceae in Bioengineering on Dry Soils

Abstract

International audienceWe tested the bioengineering capabilities and resistance to drought of cuttings of two typical riparian species of Mediterranean and Alpine streams scarcely used in soil bioengineering: Myricaria germanica (L.) Desv. and Tamarix gallica L. We conducted two experiments, one ex situ and one in situ, with different drought treatments on cuttings of these two species in comparison with Salix purpurea L., a willow very commonly used in bioengineering. The biological traits considered were resprouting/survival rate, quantity of structural roots, above- and belowground biomass, shoot-to-root ratio, and ratio of the biomass increase between the first and second season. T. gallica and M. Germanica showed generally good capabilities for soil bioengineering use. T. gallica showed especially good resprouting rates in drought conditions with a survival rate of 97 % in dry modality of the in situ experiment. M. germanica cuttings presented a much lower survival rate than the other two species in in situ experiments with harsh drought conditions from the beginning. T. gallica had a lower shoot-to-root ratio than S. purpurea for all drought treatments. M. germanica and T. gallica showed a very significant increase in belowground biomass during the second vegetative period, demonstrating that these species can quickly achieve strong anchoring. These observations confirmed the interest of these species in bioengineering

Design of fascines for riverbank protection in alpine rivers: Insight from flume experiments

“…Bioengineering techniques take advantage of the natural properties of plants to stabilise the bank with the combined effects of roots and canopy cover [Gyssels et al, 2005]. These actually very old techniques [Evette et al, 2009;Anstead et al, 2012] present many advantages: they are low-cost treatment [Watson et al, 1997], they have a small carbon footprint compared to riprap [Von Der Thannen et al, 2017], they support biodiversity and ecological functions in the riparian aquatic and terrestrial habitats created [Anstead and Boar, 2010;Cavaillé et al, 2013;Evette et al, 2013;Cavaillé et al, 2018], they can increase the resilience of riverbanks against the effects of climate change [Anstead et al, 2012;Lavaine et al, 2015], and overall, they can resist very aggressive flow conditions: for instance, fascines were observed to resist shear stress up to 250 N/m² [Lachat, 1994;Gerstgraser, 2000]. These qualities make them an ideal candidate for the restoration of low-cost rivers in remote areas [Tamrakar, 2010;Dhital et al, 2013;Tamrakar et al, 2014;Dhital and Tang, 2015] or in highly urbanized areas where green solutions are welcome [Ng et al, 2011;Zhang and Chan, 2012;Zhu and Zhang, 2015].…”

Bioengineering and Hydromechanics of Flora in Stabilization of Slopes

“…Bioengineering of soils utilizes certain features of flora components and incorporates particular features of structures with flora [4]. The resultant systems and elements have potential advantages and disadvantages, which have to be considered before choosing them for application.…”

Higher structural connectivity and resistance against invasions of soil bioengineering over hard-engineering for riverbank stabilisation

“…Soil bioengineering seeks to mimic the natural functioning of riparian vegetation, i.e. strengthening riverbanks through the use of the soil fixation properties of roots and protecting the soil via a carpet effect as well as by slowing down water flow (Li & Eddleman, 2002;Lavaine et al, 2015). Recently, several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of soil bioengineering structures in resisting shear stress (e.g.…”