2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European top managers’ support for work-life arrangements

Abstract: of analysis 6.4 Results 6.4.1 Considerations of top managers 6.4.2 Shifting considerations of top managers 2008-2011 6.5 Conclusion 7. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 7.1 Summary of the research findings 7.1.1 HR managers' attitudes 7.1.2 Conditions under which top managers support work-life arrangements 7.1.3 Understanding national differences in top managers' considerations 7.1.4 Changing considerations over time 7.2 General conclusions 7.3 Theoretical and methodological implications 7.5 Unanswered questions and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(199 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This endorses literature conclusions that emphasize that the reception of reconciliation requires a change in the organizational culture, especially in the long working hours culture, and in the managers attitude and leadership style (Been et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Litano et al, 2016) which puts the full availability and the doing of overtime as top criteria for the assessment of employees performance. A new culture must be made available, where managers support employee's reconciliation needs and ambitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This endorses literature conclusions that emphasize that the reception of reconciliation requires a change in the organizational culture, especially in the long working hours culture, and in the managers attitude and leadership style (Been et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Litano et al, 2016) which puts the full availability and the doing of overtime as top criteria for the assessment of employees performance. A new culture must be made available, where managers support employee's reconciliation needs and ambitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This culture determinates that people trying to preserve time to devote to their family and to personal matters are censored by managers and co-workers (Been et al, 2017;Hochschild, 1997;Li, Bagger, & Cropanzano, 2017;Litano, Major, Landers, Streets, & Bass, 2016;Thompson, Beauvais, & Lyness, 1999). The perceptions of lack of organizational support to reconciliation reduce the use of rights, increase the sacrifice of family life, stress, produce less job satisfaction and more intent on changing jobs.…”
Section: Work-life Reconciliation As An Issue Of Resources and Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this theory, we can expect that when there are generous national‐level family policies, this will raise the benchmark and change the culture companies operate in, making them more likely to provide company‐level family‐friendly policies. Been et al () provide evidence to show that when generous national‐level family policies exist, company‐level family‐friendly arrangements are also considered as more of a general term of employment, and managers are more likely to provide the arrangements across the board equally to all workers. Following from this, we could expect not only better access, but also a smaller division between insiders and outsiders in the access to family‐friendly WTAs in countries with generous family policies.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their important role, top managers are rarely studied in relation to the provision of work-life arrangements by organizations (see for exceptions : Been, Den Dulk, & Van der Lippe, 2016;Been et al, 2017;Warmerdam, Den Dulk, & Van Doorne-Huiskes, 2010). Previous cross-national studies tend to focus on Human Resource (HR) managers Den Dulk et al, 2010 or middle managers (Den Dulk et al, 2011;Lyness & Kropf, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%