2021
DOI: 10.1017/9781108979528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Union Corporate Tax Law

Abstract: How does EU law affect Member State corporate tax systems and the cross-border activities of companies? This book traces the historical development of EU corporate tax law and provides an in-depth analysis of a number of issues affecting companies, groups of companies, and permanent establishments. Christiana HJI Panayi examines existing legislation, soft law, and the case law of the Court of Justice, as well as the Commission's burgeoning external tax policy initiatives. The book not only explores the tax iss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the European level, Panayi (2021) states that despite the efforts made to define tax competition harmonization and coordination measures, the European Union experience has taught how difficult it is to achieve a set of general tax rules that can effectively prevent harmful tax competition and that are reasonably accepted by Member States. It is in this line that Devereux (2006) argues that the absence of international tax legislation favours the idea that one of the main factors of competitiveness and attraction of investment (Mitschke, 2008), companies (Schrenk, Zeile, Popovich, & Elisei, 2012) and people (Florida, 2007) are the tax conditions offered by each of the municipalities (Zhang, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Referentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the European level, Panayi (2021) states that despite the efforts made to define tax competition harmonization and coordination measures, the European Union experience has taught how difficult it is to achieve a set of general tax rules that can effectively prevent harmful tax competition and that are reasonably accepted by Member States. It is in this line that Devereux (2006) argues that the absence of international tax legislation favours the idea that one of the main factors of competitiveness and attraction of investment (Mitschke, 2008), companies (Schrenk, Zeile, Popovich, & Elisei, 2012) and people (Florida, 2007) are the tax conditions offered by each of the municipalities (Zhang, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Referentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate tax lawyers coined the term 'jurisdictional arbitrage' to describe such complex schemes (Fleischer, 2010;Jan and Matthias, 2021;Marian, 2013;Panayi, 2013). Jurisdictional arbitrage tends to operate through structures designed to take advantage of 'a gap between the economics of a deal and its regulatory treatment, restructuring the deal to reduce or avoid regulatory costs without unduly altering the underlying economics of the deal' (Fleischer, 2010: 227).…”
Section: Ofcs Corporate Tax Planning and Jurisdictional Arbitragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparable strategy has not yet been found or developed in the literature (see in detail 1.2). Consequently, there is also no literature on the possibility of using cross‐border reorganizations or mergers as a strategy for a tax‐optimized repatriation of profits from foreign subsidiaries (Finnerty, 2007; Endres & Spengel, 2015; Kraft/Edelmann 2019; Panayi 2021; Schmitt, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the questions to be investigated are legally based, the methodological approach and mix of methods used here is suitable and appropriate. The cross‐border merger as a possibility for tax‐optimized profit repatriation of dividends has not been discussed in the scientific literature so far (Finnerty 2007; Endres & Spengel, 2015; Kraft/Edelmann 2019; Panayi 2021; Schmitt, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%