2018
DOI: 10.1177/1947603518783455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUROVISCO Recommendations for Optimizing the Clinical Results of Viscosupplementation in Osteoarthritis

Abstract: Objectives The 3 aims of the work were to identify population subgroups that can benefit the most from viscosupplementation (VS), to provide recommendations on injection techniques, and to discuss VS appropriateness in clinical situations that are commonplace in daily practice. Methods The task force members voted on their degree of agreement on 27 statements, 36 recommendations, and 22 clinical scenarios using a 9-point scale. The strength of agreement/appropriateness/recommendation (SOA/SOR) was classified a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
36
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by 24 weeks, all WOMAC subscale scores regressed, suggesting that the treatment might not have a lasting effect in obese patients (Figure 3). Collectively, this result resembled what has been reported in obese patients with symptomatic knee OA who tend to present failure in the treatment of viscosupplementation [43, 44]. It should be noted, however, that use of a second injection for patients not showing relief introduced a potential bias that may give a negative case a second chance to be positive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, by 24 weeks, all WOMAC subscale scores regressed, suggesting that the treatment might not have a lasting effect in obese patients (Figure 3). Collectively, this result resembled what has been reported in obese patients with symptomatic knee OA who tend to present failure in the treatment of viscosupplementation [43, 44]. It should be noted, however, that use of a second injection for patients not showing relief introduced a potential bias that may give a negative case a second chance to be positive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) KL classification of knee OA grades I-III, diagnosed on radiograph and MRI imaging; (2) pain in the knee joint (VAS ≥ 1); and…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) the patient age between 18 and 80 years. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) grade IV degenerative changes as determined by the KL classification, (2) if the grade of arthritis could not be determined from the medical records, (3) inflammatory arthropathies such as rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue diseases, (4) the presence of another source of significant pain or dysfunction affecting the ability to isolate symptoms of the affected knee when evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment and (5) if the patients had already received a similar type of injection or surgical intervention within 12 months prior to treatment.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recommendations of the European Viscosupplementation Consensus Group (EUROVISCO) 18 is to treat with viscosupplementation patients with mild to moderate knee and hip OA, with normal weight or moderate overweight, who did not improve sufficiently with first-line therapies (analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and nonpharmacological therapies), or do not wish to take an oral treatment or have contraindications to analgesics. The group considered the patient's wishes as a key element in therapeutic decision making.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%