2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
173
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
173
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, there was no significant difference in diagnostic yield for the different needle sizes or the number of passes. There have been similar findings in other studies [14,16].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, there was no significant difference in diagnostic yield for the different needle sizes or the number of passes. There have been similar findings in other studies [14,16].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Higher yields have been reported by other authors but these have included ''suspicious'' cytology findings without confirmatory IHC staining [14,15]. The current study also reports a yield of 80% when both definite and suspicious diagnosis is considered.…”
supporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The definitive cytological and/or histological verification of larger gastric GIST is currently achieved in 50%-70% of EUS-guided fineneedle aspiration (FNA) or EUS-guided Trucut punch biopsies [10][11][12][13][14][15] . The histological diagnosis of GIST requires immunohistochemical detection of CD117 and particularly in CD117-negative tumors of DOG1 with the corresponding histomorphological findings.…”
Section: Eus and Eus-fnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) account for approximately 2% of gastric cancers [1] and can be challenging to diagnose due to the difficulty sampling tissue from these lesions [2]. There is no consensus on the management of these lesions, particularly when they are small or asymptomatic [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%