2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eutrophication decreases salt marsh resilience through proliferation of algal mats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During closed mouth conditions, these blooms cover the submerged macrophytes and salt marsh causing dieback (Nunes and Adams 2014). Eutrophication in a California estuary reduced salt marsh resilience through the proliferation of algal mats, reducing salt marsh cover and increasing salt marsh edge erosion (Wasson et al 2017).…”
Section: Macroalgal Bloomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During closed mouth conditions, these blooms cover the submerged macrophytes and salt marsh causing dieback (Nunes and Adams 2014). Eutrophication in a California estuary reduced salt marsh resilience through the proliferation of algal mats, reducing salt marsh cover and increasing salt marsh edge erosion (Wasson et al 2017).…”
Section: Macroalgal Bloomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many wetlands are subjected to eutrophication due to the input of excess nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), arising from fossil fuel combustion, agricultural activities and livestock waste [ 19 , 20 ]. AMF and nutrients could exert an interactive effect on plant growth [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature on how fertilization pulses alter temporal stability suggests strong effects but of an unknown direction. Wasson et al (2017) showed that eutrophication lowered the resilience in a salt march whereas Yang et al (2011) and Grman et al (2010) found positive effects of fertilization on the temporal stability of terrestrial systems. By contrast, we found strong effects of net plant biomass and removal of plants in agreement with a study by Bruelheide and Luginbühl (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%