2003
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EVA: evaluation of protein structure prediction servers

Abstract: EVA (http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/eva/) is a web server for evaluation of the accuracy of automated protein structure prediction methods. The evaluation is updated automatically each week, to cope with the large number of existing prediction servers and the constant changes in the prediction methods. EVA currently assesses servers for secondary structure prediction, contact prediction, comparative protein structure modelling and threading/fold recognition. Every day, sequences of newly available protein stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement is as high as 87% of the residues for some of the models, when a three-state assignment (helix, strand, and other) is used. This agreement is the maximum possible level of consistency given the Ϸ75% accuracy of the secondary structure prediction methods (22). Fifth, protease accessibility laddering corroborates our fold assignments ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The agreement is as high as 87% of the residues for some of the models, when a three-state assignment (helix, strand, and other) is used. This agreement is the maximum possible level of consistency given the Ϸ75% accuracy of the secondary structure prediction methods (22). Fifth, protease accessibility laddering corroborates our fold assignments ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results from several of the best-performing secondary structure prediction methods (Koh et al, 2003) [i.e., PROFphd (Rost et al, 2004), Sspro (Pollastri et al, 2002), and PSIPRED (Jones, 1999)] were used to guide the alignment of the second and fourth extracellular loops (EL2 and EL4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 34 nonredundant, full-length AidB-like sequences were aligned (Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) using the TCoffee webserver (http://igs-server.cnrs-mrs.fr/Tcoffee/tcoffee _cgi/index.cgi), which is the best-validated multiple sequence alignment method (19). Despite the evolutionary distance between the organisms, AidB is highly conserved, with no less than 67 absolutely conserved residues (numbering is based on the E. coli AidB sequence): Asn10, Ala62, Pro67, Gly76, Arg78, Pro86, Cys133, Pro134, Met137, Thr138, Lys175, Gly181, Thr185, Glu186, Lys187, Gln188, Gly189, Gly190, Asp192, Ala200, Gly212, His213, Lys214, Phe216, Ser218, Pro220, Asp223, Cys237, Phe238, Pro241, Asn250, Leu257, Lys258, Lys260, Gly262, Asn263, Asn266, Ser268, Glu270, Glu272, Gly282, Gly287, Met294, Thr298, Arg299, Arg311, Arg324, Leu331, Met337, Arg375, Lys382, Glu395, Glu398, Gly401, Gly402, Gly404, Arg413, Glu417, Pro419, Trp424, Glu425, Gly426, Gly428, Asn429, Asp434, Arg437, and Arg483.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%