2005
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evacuation decisions in a chemical air pollution incident: cross sectional survey

Abstract: Objective To compare the health outcomes in sheltered and evacuated populations after a chemical incident in a plastics factory. Design Cross sectional survey. Setting Urban area in southwest England. Participants 1750 residents from the area exposed to the chemical smoke, of which 472 were evacuated and the remaining 1278 were advised to shelter indoors. Main outcome measure Number of adverse health symptoms. A case was defined by the presence of four or more symptoms. Main results 1096 residents (63%; 299 ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, continuing to SIP after a chemical plume has passed might result in additional exposure because the indoor chemical concentrations might equilibrate with high levels in outside air. Comparisons between the two options are limited; however, Kinra et al 8 reported greater odds of experiencing symptoms among evacuees versus persons who sheltered-in-place after a chemical fire at a plastics factory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, continuing to SIP after a chemical plume has passed might result in additional exposure because the indoor chemical concentrations might equilibrate with high levels in outside air. Comparisons between the two options are limited; however, Kinra et al 8 reported greater odds of experiencing symptoms among evacuees versus persons who sheltered-in-place after a chemical fire at a plastics factory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there is a threat of wildfires due to extreme climatic conditions or an outbreak has occurred unexpectedly there are a number of measures that can be taken by health authorities to reduce the impact of the fire upon asthmatics [ 374 , 375 ].…”
Section: Wildfires and Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these workers may be at risk of exposures deleterious to physical or mental health, members of the public may also be exposed, sometimes resulting in serious negative health consequences 1 2…”
Section: Occupational and Public Health Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%