2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evacuation planning using multiobjective evolutionary optimization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
126
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
126
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These kind of rules are used in practice, and are also presented in other optimization methods (see e.g. Saadatseresht et al (2009), wherein the shortest routes are chosen to lead evacuees from there origins to their destinations). The effectiveness of the different evacuations (both under assumption of full compliance is equal to, approximately: -75,000 (optimized instructions); -37,000 (instructions created by simple rules).…”
Section: An Evacuation With Optimized Instructions Compared With An Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These kind of rules are used in practice, and are also presented in other optimization methods (see e.g. Saadatseresht et al (2009), wherein the shortest routes are chosen to lead evacuees from there origins to their destinations). The effectiveness of the different evacuations (both under assumption of full compliance is equal to, approximately: -75,000 (optimized instructions); -37,000 (instructions created by simple rules).…”
Section: An Evacuation With Optimized Instructions Compared With An Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, also methods that optimize traffic assignments or flows are included in the overview (as if they optimize instructions). In, for example, Miller-Hooks and Sorrel (2008) and Stepanov and Smith (2009), the route instructions are optimized, while in Saadatseresht et al (2009), the destination instructions are optimized. Both the route and the destination instructions are optimized in Liu et al (2006) and Ben-Tal et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (10) indicates that the start point of any truck is known to be from what depot, while Constraint (11) is the constraint on the start point of helicopters. Constraints (12) and (13) guarantee that any vehicles (i.e., truck and helicopter) after serving any nodes must come back to the start point and the route is closed. Constraint (14) ensures that each vehicle (i.e., helicopter or truck) only serves one node (a point with healthy leading road) and consequently, Constraint (15) identi es that each vehicle (helicopter) serves only one unhealthy node (a ected point with damaged leading road).…”
Section: Notations and Sets Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saadatseresht et al [12] formulated an a ected population evacuation planning model in an earthquake disaster and solved it by multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm, NSGA-II. The related results showed the validity of the model.…”
Section: Introduction 1motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For predictable disasters, which mainly are natural disasters such as hurricanes or floods, evacuation is required before disaster happens and the main objectives under this situation may be to minimise the system costs of evacuation and path risk, and to find the best location for rescue facilities (Kailiponi, 2010;Kongsomsaksakul et al, 2005;Li et al, 2012;Sherali et al, 1991). Locational aspects actually have a long tradition in emergency planning (Chang et al, 2012;Chu and Su, 2012;Daskin, 1982;Daskin and Stern, 1981;ReVelle, 1989;ReVelle and Snyder, 1995;Saadatseresht et al, 2009;Schilling et al, 1979Schilling et al, , 1980Toregas et al, 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%