Evaluación clínica de la mascarilla laríngea Baska Mask® en pacientes adultos en cirugía mayor ambulatoria

Muñoz-Rojas, G.; Fontanals, Montserrat; José, I. de San; Hermoso, A.; Valero, Ricard

doi:10.1016/j.redar.2015.01.003

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The patient comfort indices were reassuring with the use of Baska ® mask and the same have been described in earlier studies. [611] Our study confirms that the use of SAD is a potential alternative to ET in patients undergoing short gynecological procedures. Baska ® mask has shown to be associated with fewer complications than I-Gel ® device in safety analysis.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska^® mask and I-Gel^® device

Garg

Lamba

Chandra

et al. 2019

J Family Med Prim Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Supraglottic airway devices are used for anesthesia in elective surgical procedures circumventing the need for intubation. We investigated the efficacy and safety of Baska ® mask in comparison to an I-Gel ® device. Methods: In this cross-sectional, observational study, we randomized 100 female patients (age 18–45 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I or II) undergoing elective short gynecological procedures into two groups, to receive ventilation with either Baska mask ® (group 1, n = 50) or an I-Gel ® device (group 2, n = 50). We excluded patients with obesity, short neck, and known systemic and upper airway disorders. The primary outcome was the oropharyngeal airway seal pressure, and the secondary outcomes were the ease of insertion and the complication rate. The results were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U -test and Fisher's exact test, and correlation analysis was done by Spearman's correlation test. Results: A total of 56 patients underwent dilatation and curettage, whereas the remaining had hysteroscopy in the study. The airway seal pressure achieved was higher with Baska ® mask than I-Gel ® device (35.8 ± 10.3 and 26.9 ± 7.5 of cm H 2 O, respectively; P < 0.0001). The ease of insertion ( P < 0.0001) was better in group 1 and the complication rates were similar in both the groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Baska ® mask offers a superior airway seal pressure with minimum complications in comparison to an I-Gel ® device. Further studies with a large number of patients in different surgical settings are required to confirm our findings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…Few studies have compared the two devices and have given similar results in various surgical settings. [1011] Alexiev et al . have shown that Baska ® mask was superior in comparison to classic laryngeal mask airway in a sample size of 150 patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska^® mask and I-Gel^® device

Garg

Lamba

Chandra

et al. 2019

J Family Med Prim Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…and Lopez et al . [ 2 13 ] Higher OSP with Baska mask can be attributed to the type of material used in the manufacturing of these devices. Baska mask ® is made of silicone with the potential to operate normally from -100 to 300°C, while the material used for I-gel™, that is, styrene ethylene butadiene styrene which was expected to warm up to body temperature and result in improved perilaryngeal seal has not been affirmed in clinical practice.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask^® versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: Oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP) achieved by a supraglottic airway device holds due importance as it indicates the feasibility of positive pressure ventilation, the degree of airway protection from supra-cuff soiling and also relates to postoperative morbidity. The primary outcome measure was to assess and compare OSP in different head and neck positions with Baska mask ® and I-gel™. Secondary outcome measures were to compare peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), exhaled tidal volume (ETV), ease of insertion, time taken for insertion, number of attempts, intraoperative manipulations, and postoperative airway morbidity with both the devices. Materials and Methods: Seventy consenting adults scheduled for a variety of surgical procedures under general anesthesia were allocated to Group B and Group G using Baska mask ® and I-gel™ respectively. All statistical calculations were done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science). The comparison of quantitative variables between the study groups was done using Student t -test and within the variables was done by paired t -test. For comparing categorical data, Chi-square (χ 2 ) test was performed. Results: OSP was significantly higher in group B than in group G in all head and neck positions (neutral 33 ± 2.8 vs. 23.2 ± 1.8, flexion 35.5 ± 2.5 vs. 25.2 ± 1.6, extension 30.6 ± 2.7 vs. 21.4 ± 1.7, right lateral 32.6 ± 2.8 vs. 23.0 ± 1.5. left lateral 32.6 ± 2.7 vs. 23.1 ± 1.7 cm H 2 O, respectively) ( P = 0.000). PIP increased significantly in group G as compared to group B in flexion. ( P = 0.009). Baska mask ® had significantly higher ETV in flexion compared to I-gel™. ( P = 0.009). Conclusion: Baska mask ® may provide a useful alternative to I-gel™ where the glottic seal has precedence over ease of insertion.

show abstract

“…However, our study is in accordance with other single arm studies where newer SGDs were evaluated for their clinical utility. [ 4 5 14 23 24 25 ] We aimed to do a stage two study for evaluating AG as a conduit for intubation, as per recommendations for studying newer SGDs. [ 26 ] Further prospective randomised trials are needed to compare the AG with other established second-generation SGDs as per the ADEPT guidelines of Difficult Airway Society.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu^® AuraGain™: A prospective observational study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims:Ambu® AuraGain™ (AG) (Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) is a supraglottic device which has a design facilitating its use as a conduit for intubation. We designed this prospective observational study to assess the ease of AG placement in paralysed patients, determine its position and alignment to the glottis and assess its utility as a conduit for intubation.Methods:One hundred patients, aged 18–60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included in the study. The ease and number of attempts for successful insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, leak pressures, fibre-optic grade of view, number of attempts and time for tracheal intubation, time for AG removal and complications were recorded. The mean, standard deviation (SD), interquartile range (IQR) and range were calculated. The upper limit of confidence interval for overall failure rate was calculated using Wilson's score method.Results:AG was successfully inserted in all patients. The mean (SD) time taken for insertion was 17.32 (8.48) s. The median [IQR] leak pressures were 24 [20–28] cm of H2O. Optimal laryngeal view for intubation was obtained in 68 patients. Eighty-eight patients could be intubated in the first attempt. Five patients could not be intubated. The overall failure rate of device was 9%.Conclusion:AMBU® AuraGain™ serves as an effective ventilating aid, but caution is suggested before using it as a conduit for endotracheal intubation.

show abstract

Evaluación clínica de la mascarilla laríngea Baska Mask® en pacientes adultos en cirugía mayor ambulatoria

Cited by 8 publications

References 12 publications

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska^® mask and I-Gel^® device

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska^® mask and I-Gel^® device

Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask^® versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study

A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu^® AuraGain™: A prospective observational study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Evaluación clínica de la mascarilla laríngea Baska Mask® en pacientes adultos en cirugía mayor ambulatoria

Cited by 8 publications

References 12 publications

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska® mask and I-Gel® device

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska® mask and I-Gel® device

Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask® versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study

A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu® AuraGain™: A prospective observational study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska^® mask and I-Gel^® device

Supraglottic airway devices in short gynecological procedures: A randomized, clinical study comparing the Baska^® mask and I-Gel^® device

Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask^® versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study

A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu^® AuraGain™: A prospective observational study