2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7753(04)74369-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación cognitiva del anciano. Datos normativos de una muestra poblacional española de más de 70 años

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of BLT on attention levels were analyzed using the Trail Making Test (TMT) (del Ser Quijano et al, 2004;Llinàs-Reglà et al, 2017) that assesses visual search speed and sustained attention. We also used the Comprehensive TMT 3, to analyze selective attention.…”
Section: Cognitive Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of BLT on attention levels were analyzed using the Trail Making Test (TMT) (del Ser Quijano et al, 2004;Llinàs-Reglà et al, 2017) that assesses visual search speed and sustained attention. We also used the Comprehensive TMT 3, to analyze selective attention.…”
Section: Cognitive Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 24,25 ] The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) evaluated visuospatial and visuo‐constructive capacity. [ 26,27 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No differences in age and formal education were found between participants in any of the conditions (all ts < 1; see Table 1 ). Additionally, to rule out any possible mild cognitive impairments in older adults, we tested them with an online adaptation of the 7 min test (7 MT) ( Solomon et al, 1998 ; Spanish version; Ser Quijano et al, 2004 ) (from a maximum of 45 points: M = 28.59; SD = 8.26; being 22 or less is a sign of decline). In addition, we created a Sociodemographic and Daily Life questionnaire (based on Scarmeas and Stern, 2004 ), to assess their cognitive reserve ( M = 2.34; SD = 1.18; from a maximum score 5); no differences between conditions of learning, t < 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%