2019
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-10182019000500551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de la sensibilidad de cepas de Pseudomonas aeruginosa multi-resistentes frente a ceftolozano/tazobactam

Abstract: Los autores declaran no haber recibido financiación para la realización de este estudio. Los autores declaran no tener conflicto de interés alguno.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The isolates in these studies had low resistance to carbapenems; however, with temporal evolution, this frequency has increased, as described by Jácome et al (2016) and Lima et al (2020), reaching 53% and 40%, respectively, among hospital isolates from Recife-PE. The MDR isolates exhibited a lower frequency of resistance to aminoglycosides; this has also been verified in the studies of Siqueira et al (2018) and Montoro et al (2019). The great diversity presented in the susceptibility profile to the antimicrobial classes suggests the existence of an association of several resistance mechanisms, which was beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The isolates in these studies had low resistance to carbapenems; however, with temporal evolution, this frequency has increased, as described by Jácome et al (2016) and Lima et al (2020), reaching 53% and 40%, respectively, among hospital isolates from Recife-PE. The MDR isolates exhibited a lower frequency of resistance to aminoglycosides; this has also been verified in the studies of Siqueira et al (2018) and Montoro et al (2019). The great diversity presented in the susceptibility profile to the antimicrobial classes suggests the existence of an association of several resistance mechanisms, which was beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Se trata de la combinación de una cefalosporina de quinta generación con un clásico inhibidor de batalactamasas, el ceftolozano va a actuar como un bactericida provocando muerte bacteriana, su utilización está indicada en casos complicados de infecciones de vía urinaria, infección intraabdominal, pielonefritis, infecciones de piel, tejidos blandos y hueso, ya que es activo principalmente contra E. Coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Enterobacteriaceae, algunos estreptococos y escasos anaerobios, pero sobretodo tiene actividad contra Pseudomona Aeruginosa multirresistente y bacterias productoras de betalactamasas de espectro extendido. (16)(17)(18)(19) La vida media de este antibiótico es alrededor de 2,7 horas, por lo que su administración es cada 8 horas, a dosis de 1/0,5 g, sin embargo, al ser de eliminación renal, las dosis deben ser ajustadas de acuerdo al clearance de creatinina en el caso de pacientes con enfermedad renal. El uso de estos medicamentos es muy seguro, en los diversos estudios realizados entre los efectos adversos más comunes reportados tenemos náuseas, cefalea, diarrea y estreñimiento, pero no impiden que el paciente continúe con el tratamiento.…”
Section: Ceftolozano/ Tazobactamunclassified
“…Notwithstanding, the interaction of AMP and CRO is only understood partially, because most of the data have been derived from in vitro testing (checkerboard and time-kill curves) [8,12] and animal models of endocarditis [9,10,13,14] that have several limitations for PK/ PD analysis and the optimal translation to humans: (i) deficient bacterial growth, (ii) low statistical power due to intrinsic high variation and, (iii) the lack of a complete dose-response curve due to the small number of doses tested [15,16]. These limitations preclude the accurate estimation of pharmacodynamic parameters and the determination of the PK/PD index driving the efficacy of the combination, essential for proper extrapolation to the clinic [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%