2014
DOI: 10.11144/javeriana.upsy13-4.eppb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de las propiedades psicométricas del Brief COPE, su relación con el NEO PI-R y diferencias de género en Brasil

Abstract: r e s u M e n El NEO PI-R es una escala base para examinar la personalidad y el Brief COPE es un instrumento, poco difundido en Brasil, para examinar el afrontamiento. Por ello, el presente estudio transversal con muestra brasileña tiene como objetivos evaluar las propiedades psicométricas del Brief COPE, examinar su relación con el NEO PI-R, así como también evaluar las diferencias de género en el NEO PI-R y el Brief Cope. Participaron 899 adultos. El análisis factorial no confirmó la estructura original del … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Aunque es poco conocido si el género es o no un moderador en el estrés en los estudiantes, los estudios han empezado a identificar diferencias en cómo es afrontado el estrés académico en hombres y mujeres (Baker, 2003;Lee et al, 2002;Morán, Landero y González, 2010;Morán, Méndez, González, Landero-Hernández y Menezes, 2014).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…Aunque es poco conocido si el género es o no un moderador en el estrés en los estudiantes, los estudios han empezado a identificar diferencias en cómo es afrontado el estrés académico en hombres y mujeres (Baker, 2003;Lee et al, 2002;Morán, Landero y González, 2010;Morán, Méndez, González, Landero-Hernández y Menezes, 2014).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…This difference was expected because both countries have different cultural contexts, and written and spoken Portuguese in Brazil and Portugal still vary despite reforms to the Portuguese language. Furthermore, our version also contrasts with those versions investigated in other studies with Brazilian university students which adapted the Brief COPE from the Portuguese (Portugal) version [ 14 , 15 ]. In those studies [ 14 , 15 ], students probably had a different socioeconomic background from the participants of this study, who came from the underserved population, because only a minority of people from low-income groups attend university in Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first study [ 14 ], the authors reported that the Portuguese (Portugal) version had a 14-factor structure and valid factorial, convergent and discriminant characteristics in Portugal and Brazil, but a direct comparison of the Brief COPE scores between the two countries was not possible due to their variability; those authors consequently hypothesized that cultural and socioeconomic factors could have an influence on coping. Conversely, the second study [ 15 ] was not able to confirm the 14-factor structure initially proposed. As the Portuguese language and cultural aspects differ in many respects in Portugal and Brazil, it is possible that a Portuguese version for Brazilian Portuguese directly adapted from the original instrument could yield better results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, we could argue that large-scale research costs can be prohibitive with proprietary instruments. A quick review of personality instruments used in Latin American papers show that various versions of the NEO Personality Inventory in Spanish are a popular choice (Contreras-Torres, Espinosa-Méndez, & Esguerra-Pérez, 2008;Gázquez, Pérez, Mercader, & Inglés, 2014;Morán, Méndez, González, Landero-Hernández, & Menezes, 2014;Ortiz et al, 2012). When funding is a concern, turning to open-access instruments such as the IPIP can allow many studies to be conducted that would otherwise not have been possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%