2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.piro.2015.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de sobredentaduras mandibulares implanto-retenidas confeccionadas con técnica Rehabilitación Oral M/Prótesis, Facultad Odontología, Universidad de Concepción, en pacientes del Servicio Salud Bío-Bío

Abstract: Sobredentaduras implanto-retenidas;Retención; Satisfacción Terapéutica; Eficiencia masticatoria Resumen Los servicios asistenciales revelan interés por establecer protocolos de rehabilitación con sobredentaduras mandibulares retenidas a implantes, pero necesitan respaldo científico evaluado con instrumentos confiables. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar un modelo-protocolo de rehabilitación con sobredentaduras implanto retenidas para servicios públicos, por medio de test de rendimiento masticato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are highly significant, they appeared in 100% of the patients, they are consistent with the literature, and they are within the expected range and described by other authors. 9,10,18,19,22,23 In the same patients, in this study, the therapeutic satisfaction increased significantly, with previous values to the connection of PM 90 points (poor or bad), a PM 130 points (satisfactory or very satisfactory), post connection prosthesis implant (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These results are highly significant, they appeared in 100% of the patients, they are consistent with the literature, and they are within the expected range and described by other authors. 9,10,18,19,22,23 In the same patients, in this study, the therapeutic satisfaction increased significantly, with previous values to the connection of PM 90 points (poor or bad), a PM 130 points (satisfactory or very satisfactory), post connection prosthesis implant (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%