2011
DOI: 10.4067/s0370-41062011000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de una intervención en actividad física en niños con síndrome de Down

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Eurofit Test Battery is a reliable tool to assess and discriminate the performance levels of physical fitness in patients with IDs (MacDonncha et al ; Skowronski et al ). Specifically, the field‐based Six‐Minute Walk Test has also been used to assess aerobic capacity in this population (Mosso et al ). However, according to the American College of Sports Medicine (), maximal oxygen uptake is considered the most reliable measure of cardiorespiratory fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eurofit Test Battery is a reliable tool to assess and discriminate the performance levels of physical fitness in patients with IDs (MacDonncha et al ; Skowronski et al ). Specifically, the field‐based Six‐Minute Walk Test has also been used to assess aerobic capacity in this population (Mosso et al ). However, according to the American College of Sports Medicine (), maximal oxygen uptake is considered the most reliable measure of cardiorespiratory fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For WHI (percentage of weight in the 50th percentile of the real height of children in the CDC/NCHS curves) in the classification we used: <90% low weight, 90---110% normal weight, 110---120% overweight, >120% obesity. 15 The tricipital skinfold (TSF) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) indicators obtained were: mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MUAMC), mid-upper arm muscle area and mid-upper arm fat area (MUAFA). These indicators were classified according to Frisancho's proposal 16 as very low (<5p), low (5p ≤ 10p), normal (10p ≤ 90p), high (90p ≤ 95p) and very high (>95p).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el caso del IMC se utilizó los siguientes puntos de corte: bajo peso (< p10), normal (> p10-p85), sobrepeso (> p85-< p95) y obesidad (≥ p95). Para el IP/T (% peso en el percentil 50 de la talla real de niños en las curvas CDC/NCHS) en la clasificación fue: < 90% bajo peso, 90-110% normal, 110-120% sobrepeso, > 120% obesidad 15 .…”
Section: Pacientes Y Métodosunclassified