2019
DOI: 10.22370/ieya.2019.5.2.1493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación formativa en proyectos universitarios de aprendizaje-servicio: un estudio diacrónico

Abstract: El establecimiento de vínculos entre la Universidad y la comunidad en que se halla inserta es un reto permanente. Esta relación de enriquecimiento y beneficio mutuo no sólo se cristaliza a través de la transferencia de conocimiento sino también mediante el servicio. Y cuando, dentro de la comunidad, este servicio va dirigido a alumnado con necesidades educativas especiales (NEE), entramos de lleno en el ámbito de la educación inclusiva, alcanzándose objetivos que van más allá de los de mero conocimiento. En el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is shown in the literature, most assessment tools designed to evaluate SL experiences are meant to be used by SL participants themselves. In order to carry out a formative assessment, SL assessment tools must be meaningful to them and adapted to each specific project [17] since nobody better than participants know the key elements for self-assessment and improvement [18,19]. In the present study, students' self-assessment and instructor's assessment are contrasted.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is shown in the literature, most assessment tools designed to evaluate SL experiences are meant to be used by SL participants themselves. In order to carry out a formative assessment, SL assessment tools must be meaningful to them and adapted to each specific project [17] since nobody better than participants know the key elements for self-assessment and improvement [18,19]. In the present study, students' self-assessment and instructor's assessment are contrasted.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%