2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a combined WRF and CityFFD method for calculating urban wind distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[65], [66] ENVI-met was developed in 1998 by Bruse and Fleer [58]. This software can simulate microscale interactions between the atmosphere, vegetation, and surfaces.…”
Section: Envimetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[65], [66] ENVI-met was developed in 1998 by Bruse and Fleer [58]. This software can simulate microscale interactions between the atmosphere, vegetation, and surfaces.…”
Section: Envimetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As weaknesses, the lack of wall functions, radiation, vegetation and pollutants models were reported. Wang et al [66] developed a study that first validated the CityFFD software and WRF-CityFFD combined method. It was concluded that with the combined method, it was possible to achieve an accurate wind distribution, especially in coastal areas and with a limited number of meteorological stations.…”
Section: Envimetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common problem for microscale CFD urban models is the proper specification of the initial and boundary conditions, as the traditional input from single-point observations does not represent the variability of the meteorological elements even in a small part of the city [28]. To deal with this issue, a combination of a mesoscale meteorological model with a fine-scale obstacle-resolving CFD model was found to provide realistic flow fields with resolution of a few metres [28][29][30]. A combined model system for obstacle-resolving dispersion simulations in urban areas might consist of single models with varying complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%