2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2021.101800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a continuing professional development course on cognitive functions for Music Therapists working in care homes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the interpretation of the results, a threshold of 3.5/5 (70% of the rating scale score) was chosen as a measure of task appreciation (Mangiacotti et al, 2021). Experts’ ratings on each question were grouped by exercise (Table 1) and the results of the three beta-MCT overall-judgment Likert questions are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the interpretation of the results, a threshold of 3.5/5 (70% of the rating scale score) was chosen as a measure of task appreciation (Mangiacotti et al, 2021). Experts’ ratings on each question were grouped by exercise (Table 1) and the results of the three beta-MCT overall-judgment Likert questions are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most MT academic training programs are based on a psychotherapeutic approach with limited focus on neuropsychological insights and tools (Mangiacotti et al, 2021; Thaut, 2015). Music therapists traditionally use qualitative forms of assessment during patient evaluation, which constrains identification of cognitive impairment and suitability of the therapy (Lipe et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation