2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a game-based randomized experiment to increase melanoma identification among adults living in the U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The publication years of the included studies were from 2016 to 2022. Most of the studies were from the USA (n = 7) [22][23][24]28,29,31,32]. The re- Most of the selected articles are primary studies except for an extensive narrative review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The publication years of the included studies were from 2016 to 2022. Most of the studies were from the USA (n = 7) [22][23][24]28,29,31,32]. The re- Most of the selected articles are primary studies except for an extensive narrative review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The re- Most of the selected articles are primary studies except for an extensive narrative review. The selection consisted of three randomized controlled trials [21][22][23]; one randomized experimental study [24]; two qualitative studies [25,26]; three pilot studies [27][28][29]; one evaluation study [30]; one community advisory board study [31]; and one study with a mixed-method approach [32]. The publication years of the included studies were from 2016 to 2022.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, it has been shown that educational programs on skin self-examinations in schools may help to establish the use of sunscreen and continued self-examination behaviors which are helpful for early melanoma detection [58]. In a similar vein, game-based training on the ABCD (E excluded for training on static images) or UDS (ugly duckling sign) methods of SSE increased accurate melanoma identification in a study of the general population in the U.S. [59], suggesting that educational efforts based on established SSE aids may improve the detection of suspicious melanocytic lesions.…”
Section: The Ugly Duckling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While suspicious lesions can oftentimes be identified without the aid of any tools, one of the most effective ways to visually confirm the suspicious features associated with melanoma is by using a dermatoscope. The dermatoscope, invented in 1989 [59], operates as a specialized magnification device that allows physicians to observe skin areas with high detail, and can now be attached to cameras to take high-resolution photos [61]. The use of this device has shown to be extremely effective in the identification of melanoma amongst both dermatology specialists and general practitioners [62].…”
Section: Dermatoscopesmentioning
confidence: 99%